VIDEOS!!! MLK WEEKEND!!!
#61
VIDEOS!!! MLK WEEKEND!!!
Originally posted by: ItalianStallion
DAVE...I'll answer that for ya...No he never touched the carb.All he did was change gearing and ran the next day.He said it was running fine so there was no need to change.The odd part of dyno numbers is....My bike pulled a 59.4 and hers pulled a 58.?...she blew me in the weeds big time.Not just a weight difference...Tom rode it as well and still kicked my butt bad.The numbers seem to be just a guide line of sorts.If it were jetted properly and she had the Barkers on it , I'm sure it would have pulled a 60 to 63
DAVE...I'll answer that for ya...No he never touched the carb.All he did was change gearing and ran the next day.He said it was running fine so there was no need to change.The odd part of dyno numbers is....My bike pulled a 59.4 and hers pulled a 58.?...she blew me in the weeds big time.Not just a weight difference...Tom rode it as well and still kicked my butt bad.The numbers seem to be just a guide line of sorts.If it were jetted properly and she had the Barkers on it , I'm sure it would have pulled a 60 to 63
#62
VIDEOS!!! MLK WEEKEND!!!
Originally posted by: ItalianStallion
DAVE...I'll answer that for ya...No he never touched the carb.All he did was change gearing and ran the next day.He said it was running fine so there was no need to change.The odd part of dyno numbers is....My bike pulled a 59.4 and hers pulled a 58.?...she blew me in the weeds big time.Not just a weight difference...Tom rode it as well and still kicked my butt bad.The numbers seem to be just a guide line of sorts.If it were jetted properly and she had the Barkers on it , I'm sure it would have pulled a 60 to 63
DAVE...I'll answer that for ya...No he never touched the carb.All he did was change gearing and ran the next day.He said it was running fine so there was no need to change.The odd part of dyno numbers is....My bike pulled a 59.4 and hers pulled a 58.?...she blew me in the weeds big time.Not just a weight difference...Tom rode it as well and still kicked my butt bad.The numbers seem to be just a guide line of sorts.If it were jetted properly and she had the Barkers on it , I'm sure it would have pulled a 60 to 63
really weird though, how the numebrs are so close, and we even changed riders, the diff in builds are cam and pipe difference... sis has a better cam and stallion has a better pipe.
#63
VIDEOS!!! MLK WEEKEND!!!
Did you dyno with the same tires and do you have the same paddles? Hers has 01 gears and you have 02. Did you ever drag on flat ground? Did they do any torque graphs? Sorry for so many questions but this is interesting to me. 344PV said it first the torque is the key.
#65
VIDEOS!!! MLK WEEKEND!!!
Just on abservation.
Stallion and I were neck and neck, I know that on this video, I pulled on him, but most of the races we had, were side by side, it he did not win. He dynoed at 59.4 hp. My bike has to be lighter (450R vs Rappy), but its no drag set up, I am 235-40 (depending on what I ate) and I would guess Stallion is closer to 200. Lets call it close enough for the s I take out, on weight.
The stock bore winner (under 501) was Pinnit Motorsports built 450R, Jeff Kyle owner/rider. He could pull me by the same distance (roughly) as RapFam's sis. He dynoed at 53 hp at sea level.
I did not dyno there, so take it for what its worth, just pointing out an observation.
EDIT: This shows you that there are so many variables that have to do with speed up the hill. Only one of many is HP/tq.
Stallion and I were neck and neck, I know that on this video, I pulled on him, but most of the races we had, were side by side, it he did not win. He dynoed at 59.4 hp. My bike has to be lighter (450R vs Rappy), but its no drag set up, I am 235-40 (depending on what I ate) and I would guess Stallion is closer to 200. Lets call it close enough for the s I take out, on weight.
The stock bore winner (under 501) was Pinnit Motorsports built 450R, Jeff Kyle owner/rider. He could pull me by the same distance (roughly) as RapFam's sis. He dynoed at 53 hp at sea level.
I did not dyno there, so take it for what its worth, just pointing out an observation.
EDIT: This shows you that there are so many variables that have to do with speed up the hill. Only one of many is HP/tq.
#68
VIDEOS!!! MLK WEEKEND!!!
Originally posted by: Dfitz
Did you dyno with the same tires and do you have the same paddles? Hers has 01 gears and you have 02. Did you ever drag on flat ground? Did they do any torque graphs? Sorry for so many questions but this is interesting to me. 344PV said it first the torque is the key.
Did you dyno with the same tires and do you have the same paddles? Hers has 01 gears and you have 02. Did you ever drag on flat ground? Did they do any torque graphs? Sorry for so many questions but this is interesting to me. 344PV said it first the torque is the key.
stallion - sis
max hp = 59.4 58.7 = adv. stallion by .7 hp
torque = 44.6 44.8 = adv. sis by .2 ft/lbs
never ran on flat ground, sis is 01 gearing 12/43, stal is 02 gearing 13/43 (sis was still geared to low, she needed 12/42 or maybe even 12/41???)
#70