FST 446 kit will run around 2grand with all the accessoires, cam, headwork, and that will pump out more then 40 hp, with a ton more torque.

 

theres no way in hell a blaster is faster stock cuz i just raced one(finally got my quad started) and i murderd it by atleast 10 lengths so take away my mods away and i still beat it by atleast 2 or 3 lengths then i raced another one w/ fmf silencer (gold series) i think and fmf pipe and air filter and beat it by about 7 lengths and both the kids have been riding longer then me maybe im a quick learning and there not but idk maybe ill get a vid up in a couple days then i raced my buddy he has a z400 w/ e-series exhaust and he won by lik 3-4 lengths which i find reasonible cuz its a 400 w/ a pipe comprared to a 350 w a pipe




ne wayz bak to yur ? id say warrior and not cuz i own one but there more trail friendly w/ the emision ppl cracking down the places in the us to ride 2-strokes is gonna slim down drastically not only that but some ppl may argue me but i think the warrior is more advanced and somethign u can grow into + if u feel lik selling it later its gonna b just as much stock as a blaster would b w/ a **** load of mods soo it all comes down to money again

 

hey shav0..... stock for stock a warrior is faster than a blaster.... a stock warrior is as fast as a blaster with a pipe... sept the warrior has a lil more top end.

it all depends what kind of riding ur doin. a warrior is more reliable. 2 stroke motors dont last as long a a 4 stroke will but the blaster imo is a funner bike to ride. i like ridin my dads warrior but it feels bolky... cause im used to my blaster. idk tho. ur gona ride it so get what ur most comfertable with.

 

hey faster blaster nice pics and how u fixed your truck in 2 1/2 hrs my dad once toke out his starter and installed a new one w/ a pair of pliars!!! cuz he was stuck on the road w/ no insurance

 

mine was 2800

 

1st off welcome to the forms and 2nd off every one here has made good point's but i figured this much out if your a big boy weight wise then a blaster will not like you and you will kill all it power lol but on the other hand the warrior can carry much azz and still have power to spare so if you weigh 200 + i would not get a blaster. And about reliability yes the warrior will last longer than the blaster but if you take care of the blaster it will probaly last longer than you want it you just have to take care of em[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img] let us know what you get.

 

got mine fer 1200 spent $400 and hanging w/ the 400's

 

I agree with shav0..and they can be modded to suit your weight and height, and are quicker then a warrior stock, but the warrior pulls away 2nd gear up, but with a pipe the blaster and they are pretty much even. Port that blaster and it's all over for the warrior, and now the 400's are blaster competition. And like everyone said the 2 strokes cost way less to mod and rebuild etc...

 

i think that u should get a warrior because blasters are to small and they are such a hasel to deal with warriors are the way to go[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

Man I donno if you guys are riding some super warriors or somthing, but I want one. A buddy of mine ownes a bone stock warrior and we used to hook up all the time when mine was stock, he just couldn't compete in all aspects, including the 300 foot'er.