blaster vs. 250z
#22
Originally posted by: warriorryder
who would want to spend money on a brand new 250cc 4 stroke....so slow....who dug this post up anyway...its like 5 months old
who would want to spend money on a brand new 250cc 4 stroke....so slow....who dug this post up anyway...its like 5 months old
okay, this is coming form the kid who doesn't know what kind of pipe he has on his quad...interesting...or should i say funny?
#24
look warriorryder, im sure you're a nice kid and all, and i have nothing against you, you insulted my quad, so i insulted yours...actually i insulted you and for that i apoligize but im just trying to get my poingt across, which is yes, blasters are faster, weve gotten past that part, but the z250 is the better quad here...
#25
Maby if your a girl and need reverse and an auto clutch (factory) then ya... a z250 is the perfect quad for you... A sluggish motor, horrible suspension, way too heavy why would you invest into a z250? Shaft Driven?? I mean come on, whats the point of that? Is it because people are too lazy to oil the chain and tighen the chain every once in a while? And plus if the shaft ever broke then your looking into more money to replace the shaft than it would to replace a few links in a chain.
#26
Originally posted by: Fastblasterboy
Maby if your a girl and need reverse and an auto clutch (factory) then ya... a z250 is the perfect quad for you... A sluggish motor, horrible suspension, way too heavy why would you invest into a z250? Shaft Driven?? I mean come on, whats the point of that? Is it because people are too lazy to oil the chain and tighen the chain every once in a while? And plus if the shaft ever broke then your looking into more money to replace the shaft than it would to replace a few links in a chain.
Maby if your a girl and need reverse and an auto clutch (factory) then ya... a z250 is the perfect quad for you... A sluggish motor, horrible suspension, way too heavy why would you invest into a z250? Shaft Driven?? I mean come on, whats the point of that? Is it because people are too lazy to oil the chain and tighen the chain every once in a while? And plus if the shaft ever broke then your looking into more money to replace the shaft than it would to replace a few links in a chain.
horrible suspension? the suspension on a z250 is gotta be 5x better than on a blaster, and last time i checked my quad was manual clutch...don't beleive me? look at my pics...and you have to replace the chain and sprockets a lot more than you'd have to change a shaft...maybe the point of taht would to make the quad as low maintenince and reliable as possible...hell i beat the **** out of mine and it hasn't fallen apart at all...way too heavy? jsut because the blaster is light and it's made out of peice of crap unreliable peices doesn't make the z250 heavy...hell it weighs less than z400s...every magazine rates the suzuki better than any 200-250 out there and the only one faster is the blaster but yet it still loses...what more do you want me to say? tell me one thing other than the fact that the blaster is faster and lighter that would make me want to sell the z250 and start riding my blaster


