Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Which quad is best for me???????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 09:28 PM
  #21  
dawarriorman's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Default

and the scramble is automatic. yeah, that's real high performance there.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:11 PM
  #22  
ex4life's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Default

I would go with the 300ex if you want clutch but if you don't go with a 250ex. Dont go near a polaris, they do nothing but give you problems. a warrior would be good to.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:33 PM
  #23  
scramdaddy400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Default

Excuse me but before you start making false accusations, polaris during the past 6 years has eliminated almost 95% of all problems with their machines. Their not holding the number 2 spot in sales cuz they look pretty (well that too), their holding it cuz of customer satisfaction.

2000 SCRAMBLER 400 2X4

SCRAMDADDY400
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:37 PM
  #24  
scramdaddy400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Default

That understandable No2StrokeBs.

2000 SCRAMBLER 400 2X4

SCRAMDADDY400
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:38 PM
  #25  
DocDom's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Default

OUCH!!"Battle Ship", "cast iron"...I'd agree that the 400 ex would take the rubber banded trany of a polaris. I have DS 650 and in the snow and ice my friend who is a woman kicks my butt out of the hole. After third my "battle ship" of a quad finally catches up and shuts her down....anyway, the Honda 400 ex is a great bike, my female friend was a first time rider and does great on it. Even without reverse she has had no problems if she gets into a tight trail or otherwise. Finally, it is hard to beat the realiability of the 400 ex.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:41 PM
  #26  
scramdaddy400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Default

Automatics shift faster than humans...Duhwarriorman!!!

2000 SCRAMBLER 400 2X4

SCRAMDADDY400
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:47 PM
  #27  
BiffBlaster's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

I'd go with DevRay on this one, the Blaster would be perfect for you its light weight and its a cheap quad and pretty fast,you can take the money you saved from buying another quad and supe it up, theres nothing like the performance and sound of a screaming 2-stroke underneath you.Plus its oil-injected so you dont gotta worry about mixing gas like other 2 strokes.
 
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2001 | 10:59 PM
  #28  
juggalo's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Default

for once i agree with scramdaddy about the scrambler. if its true about being the same price as a 300EX. i had the chance to ride a 300EX over the last weekend and i was really disapointed with it. but i'm used to my LT and my friends 400EX so i'm sure to a beginner rider a 300EX would also be fine. warriors are pretty nice also.

ps- how old r u?
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2001 | 03:57 PM
  #29  
LovleyQuadChick's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Default

I would just like to thank you all for you suggestions!
Lovely
 
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2001 | 08:28 PM
  #30  
1BadWarrior's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Default

If I were you I would get the Warrior. They may not but the fastest, but these things can go anywhere you can take them. For lack of better saying they are built like a tank. All you have to do is change the oil and clean the air filter and put some gas in and go. I have had a 99 Warrior for about 2 years now and I still like it. I have put this Warrior through loads of stuff mud, water, and even one fence(don't ask) and the problem I have had is my back tire keeps leaking down. Warriors are great for play and woods machines. Get the Warrior
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:57 AM.