the pipe gives me a lot more power. it sounds like a real two stroke than sounding tingy like stock, its deep sounding.

 

the 300 has a front and rear sprocket, pluse an amp link

 

Your Blaster should beat a 300ex going backwards you can pull over take a **** jump back on your bike and the 300ex will barely be coming.lol

 

ridingmaniac420
you are a fool always talking about your stock blaster. so do they come stock with the new bottom end, port and polish, not to mention the weiseco piston and all that other ****? hmm i think not
its still not fast enough to pass me, keep working on it and maybe.. just maybe you can catch up to me one of these days.

 

Hey max shut the #$@% up. All it takes to beat you with a blaster is about $300. Thats a big bore kit. And you would still have about 2,500 dollars more into your 400ex.

 

$300 for a big bore kit! Your full of ****. The CT 240 kit is way up there.

 

troy (blaster1435) the only reason you beat the 300EX was bc that kid was about 75lbs more then you and he had thos buble turf tamer wanna be's on it. And im glad i spent more money then you im not the one looking for a new quad.

 

Well i would like to race your big bad 400. I can easily keep up with a lightly modded 400ex. The only problem I am having is keeping the front down taking the holeshot. So if u wana run your mouth about my blaster then come race me.

 

don't all you blaster relize something? the blaster is a kid's quad. it has no power and it feels like a power wheels. I know for a fact when i had my 300ex i could beat any blaster that came along and yes they had pipes and piston. My 300 was stock. It is all the rider but come on the blaster is crap. Get a real 2-stroke.

 

Stock for stock the Blaster is faster than a 300EX. Drag race them all day long, the Blaster is definately faster. If you think otherwise than you are kidding yourself.

http://www.blastercentral.com/NoFram..._00_Page26.jpg