Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Makuni VS Dynojet??

Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:14 PM
  #1  
racereadyraptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:20 PM
  #2  
racereadyraptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

Is there anymore power to be had by switching to DJ needles and jets?
I bought the whole kit only to take it all out when I got my K&N and pipe...They did not have big enough jets,and you can't mix them with makuni.Then I found out that you can order single jets in any size....Is it worth it to take the makuni back out and replace it with th DJ?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:26 PM
  #3  
RoostItUp's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

Keep in mind that the DJ mains are totally different. With the way your setup if your below 1000 ft. put the 148/150 mains in with the DJ needle on recommended setting.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:48 PM
  #4  
racereadyraptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

I had the 148/150 DJ setup on it until I installed the Pro Flow and the K&N.After that it ran like a$$.I than installed Makuni 175/180 and #25 pilots and it run's awesome.I was wondering if DJ jet's of the same value would produce even more power,or would I have to go down a jet size to utilize the benifits of their taper?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 01:54 PM
  #5  
RoostItUp's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

The 148/150 setup should be enough, my bike was running very strong and a tiny bit rich with that setup. The reason the DJ jets are smaller is cause of the way smaller needle which supplies more fuel throughout the whole RPM range.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 03:01 PM
  #6  
shutupholdon's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

So is the Dynojet better than the mikuni jets? I had always thought the mikuni's were the ones to buy.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 03:53 PM
  #7  
RacinJason's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,132
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

Hmmm can they be better? Or is it just a matter of size and flow rate of fuel?
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
racereadyraptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

Well they(DynoJet) claim to be better...I was just looking for some real time info from someone who might have pondered the same question.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-cool.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #9  
shutupholdon's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

Yea, I would like to know what is the better kit. I am getting ready to pick one up today or tomorrow.
 
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2003 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
racereadyraptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Default Makuni VS Dynojet??

shutupholdon, I wouldn't buy the kit.The kit comes with 10 thousand jets you don't need..you can buy single jets on line if you go with the DJ. If you stay with Makuni...You can get them at any dealership foe 2 bucks each.
Don't do the same thing I did and have 75.00 worth of unuseable jets sitting in your toolbox!
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:50 AM.