Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Yamaha blaster or Suzuki lt 250?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-25-2012, 12:49 PM
Cap9709's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster or Suzuki lt 250?

Hey guys im planning on getting a project bike that will be rather cheap, but reliable and fast and easy to work on. Any help appreciated, thanks!
 
  #2  
Old 06-25-2012, 06:29 PM
Raptor450's Avatar
Pro Rider
I ride, because football, basketball, and baseball only uses one ball!
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Of course, this is in the Yamaha section, so there may be some biased opinions here, but trying not to be one-sided, my vote is for the Blaster - they are cheap, easy to work on, parts are plentiful, parts are cheap, etc, etc...........Parts are as cheap as anything out there. The LT250 can be cheap, and they're easy to work on, but parts are not as plentiful or as cheap as the Blaster's. The 2003 - up Blasters had disc brakes, so one of those would be much better than the older models, the old drum brakes suck.
 
  #3  
Old 06-25-2012, 10:48 PM
Scooter86's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Knows Old ATV Questions!
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5,127
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Raptor450
Of course, this is in the Yamaha section, so there may be some biased opinions here, but trying not to be one-sided, my vote is for the Blaster - they are cheap, easy to work on, parts are plentiful, parts are cheap, etc, etc...........Parts are as cheap as anything out there. The LT250 can be cheap, and they're easy to work on, but parts are not as plentiful or as cheap as the Blaster's. The 2003 - up Blasters had disc brakes, so one of those would be much better than the older models, the old drum brakes suck.
Pretty much what he said. I have a lot of love for the old Qracers, but reliable they are not. Blaster had a MUCH longer run, so parts are going to be easier to find as the years roll along. Ease of maintenance is probably a toss up.

Pick two Cheap and fast, LT. Cheap and more likely to be reliable, Blaster. Cheap, fast, and reliable look for a well maintained Honda 250R.
 
  #4  
Old 06-25-2012, 11:11 PM
WaaHeHe94's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At some of the local events that I race at I still see people racing both the Quadracer 250 and the Blaster.Both are nice quads but the Quadracer 250 is in a different class than the Blaster when it comes to power, it was made to compete with the Honda 250R.With that being said the Blaster will probably be the easiest and cheapest of the two to build, but not the fastest, because it was in production longer and probably more popular than the Quadracer 250.I think that the Quadracer 250 was only in production from 1985 to 1992 while the Blaster was in production from 1988 to 2006.

Here's some old articles that I have on both quads.





 
  #5  
Old 06-26-2012, 05:23 PM
Cap9709's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't plan on racing, just a fun, fast, easy bike to build. Thanks for all the info!
 
  #6  
Old 08-23-2012, 08:27 PM
chad21000's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

in real life though a blaster cant keep up with a 250r and i would say get the blaster over the lt250, there a blast to ride and plenty of parts you can buy and 2 strokes always seemed like they gained more power then a four stroke did when you upgrade them.
 
  #7  
Old 03-19-2013, 06:38 AM
cloak's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

agreed....the Yamaha Blaster is a "blast" to ride...plenty of power for a 200cc....plenty of aftermarket parts..lots of upgrades available...Ive had 3 of them...easy builds...i recommend a big bore kit if nothing else.........and an extended swingarm.....the wheelbase on the blaster is a little small for larger riders
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1966F100
Yamaha
5
08-21-2015 07:10 PM
scott1988
Yamaha
9
08-18-2015 08:44 AM
Stirling
Introduce Yourself
3
08-11-2015 07:23 AM
315blaster
Other ATV Topics
0
08-08-2015 08:13 PM
drewy2dope
Ask the Editor
11
07-31-2015 09:36 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Yamaha blaster or Suzuki lt 250?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 AM.