New Raptor 350 engine!
#1
That's awesome that Yamaha improved the warrior, but that engine should have been gone in my opinion. At least a 4 valve head. Other than that good job Yamaha. I only wish that Honda would redesign the 400ex, liquid cooling, better suspension, something like that!
#3
i also think yamaha did a great job!, i agree that they should have done somthing with the engin and i would have liked a more creative name than the raptor 350, i would like to hear how it compaires to a warrior!
#4
Originally posted by: FaStLaNe
But its 5 grand!! Way too much IMO to compete with the 300ex. But, why keep the Warrior in the lineup? That doesn't make much sense.....
But its 5 grand!! Way too much IMO to compete with the 300ex. But, why keep the Warrior in the lineup? That doesn't make much sense.....
#5
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] how come its only yamaha that does wut the ppl want....think about it
honda took a long time for that 1 modle yamaha has 3 to compare with it
honda still is on the 300ex while yamaha is trying to improve
and so on
why couldn't honda keep the 250r like yamaha kept the banshee maybe becasue yamaha found out that the ppl liked it and wanted it to stay so they kept it
I am a honda lover though.....
honda took a long time for that 1 modle yamaha has 3 to compare with it
honda still is on the 300ex while yamaha is trying to improve
and so on
why couldn't honda keep the 250r like yamaha kept the banshee maybe becasue yamaha found out that the ppl liked it and wanted it to stay so they kept it
I am a honda lover though.....
#6
compete with the 300ex you mean the 400ex. the 300ex can't run with a warrior.
warriors are good bikes, i know- i had one - but it handles like a tank compared to bikes of today. but i would take a 300EX over one anyday.
#7
if yamaha came out with a 4 valve head design for the 350 raptor id definetely be getting a new head.
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by: rede34m5
compete with the 300ex you mean the 400ex. the 300ex can't run with a warrior.
Originally posted by: FaStLaNe
But its 5 grand!! Way too much IMO to compete with the 300ex. But, why keep the Warrior in the lineup? That doesn't make much sense.....
But its 5 grand!! Way too much IMO to compete with the 300ex. But, why keep the Warrior in the lineup? That doesn't make much sense.....
#9
Originally posted by: hondarider86
A 300ex can keep up/beat a warrior without much trouble.
Originally posted by: rede34m5
compete with the 300ex you mean the 400ex. the 300ex can't run with a warrior.
Originally posted by: FaStLaNe
But its 5 grand!! Way too much IMO to compete with the 300ex. But, why keep the Warrior in the lineup? That doesn't make much sense.....
But its 5 grand!! Way too much IMO to compete with the 300ex. But, why keep the Warrior in the lineup? That doesn't make much sense.....


