I just switched to an Outlander
#1
Hi all,
I just purchased a 2004 Outlander 400 HO yesterday. Got a great deal and a fair amount for trading in my 2000 Arctic Cat 500 Auto. Looking forward to testing it out in the near future.
A couple of questions regarding accessories. Does anyone offer individual bags for the racks so that the cubby compartments don't have to get covered? Also, does anyone think the skid plate is needed? It seems the design of the frame would be sufficient for protection.
Any other information on things to check out or watch for is appreciated.
Thanks!!!
I just purchased a 2004 Outlander 400 HO yesterday. Got a great deal and a fair amount for trading in my 2000 Arctic Cat 500 Auto. Looking forward to testing it out in the near future.
A couple of questions regarding accessories. Does anyone offer individual bags for the racks so that the cubby compartments don't have to get covered? Also, does anyone think the skid plate is needed? It seems the design of the frame would be sufficient for protection.
Any other information on things to check out or watch for is appreciated.
Thanks!!!
#5
I'm also frustrated with the lack of accessories. I'm looking for a good rear box for mine. No hard boxes except aftermarket. Bombardier has a front and rear bag, rack extenders and front and rear bumpers. That's pretty much it. Don't get the rack extenders if you are planning on plastic boxes. Bombardiers bags will work with the extenders. Pretty weak accessory line-up for such a nice quad.
#7
jefffoxsr,
I really can't conclusively comment on the differances in ride between the two yet. For the test riding I did, I can comment on a couple of noticable differances. The first is the acceleration. The outlander definitely has more hole shot. It is easier to handle due to the lighter weight. The seating position and handle bars remind me of a Polaris, although it seems that you are "higher" than the cat, the outlander doesn't feel nearly as tippy as the cat which didn't have independent rear suspension.
I'll post more as I get more miles on it.
Does anyone know what to expect for gas milage? The cat got 13 MPG.
Thanks!!
I really can't conclusively comment on the differances in ride between the two yet. For the test riding I did, I can comment on a couple of noticable differances. The first is the acceleration. The outlander definitely has more hole shot. It is easier to handle due to the lighter weight. The seating position and handle bars remind me of a Polaris, although it seems that you are "higher" than the cat, the outlander doesn't feel nearly as tippy as the cat which didn't have independent rear suspension.
I'll post more as I get more miles on it.
Does anyone know what to expect for gas milage? The cat got 13 MPG.
Thanks!!
Trending Topics
#8
I'm getting better than 20 mpg so far. I have no problem going over 80 miles on a tank, and expect it will go 100. I only have around 275 miles, so I figure it to improve as it breaks in as well. I just got a big plastic cargo box at Walmart for $18. I put holes in it to match the rack bolt holes and bolted it down. Works great. If you do a lot of riding in rocky areas, you might want to consider the skid plate. Otherwise I wouldn't worry about it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fordfaithful21
Polaris Ask an Expert! In fond memory of Old Polaris Tech.
9
Dec 7, 2015 05:52 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



