i personally think most of them are biased and use info to get readers lik when they said the ds 650 is the fastest production quad then a couple issues later they say the yfz goes faster then the ds(this was all in 04 when they plenty of tests alrdy on the yfz) so its not lik they didnt no when they said ds 650 is fastesti also think that there lies and kill ppll lik saying the banshee goes 60 and the yfz goes 62 ppl go out and buy these things and kill thmselves with to much power lik crash into a tree going 70 and i dont think there shoot outs ae all that fair lik the 300ex vs raptor 350 vs 400ex most ppl wanted to know about the 300 and 350 and all they talked about was the 400ex and they dont go into depth about nething but the quads they have lik a 2 pg shoot out for tires and a 12 pg shoot out w/ quads and 1/2 a pg reveiws and sumtimes only small paragrapghs wat do u guyz think

 

I enjoy the ads and the photos of quads that readers send in. Some of the articles are cool but I do agree that they don't always give the products/quads a fair shake (Rancher....last place in the shootout....bah). I still enjoy reading them all.....cover to cover. I keep them in a magazine rack, right next to the toilet [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

I read a lot of atv magazines....I really like finding websites and stuff off the ad's, and some of the pic's people send in. Taking the shootouts and the shootout info to heart is a bit crazy though.

 

i agree it is good sh!ter reading and i do also enjoy the pix from ppl and ads but i think that we should have a mag w/ all the fourms of the month w/ correct info how awsome would that me lik actually sold on the stand