Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Rancher Or Foreman???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 06:14 PM
  #1  
mudcovered's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

I went ATV shopping today. At the local dealership I found a 98' Foreman 400 with 3000 miles on it for $3900. The I also saw a 2001 Rancher ES 4x4 there. The Dealer said he would take $4900 for it. So here's my dilema. Which one should I get. I do a lot of trail riding but I need something to do work with as well. I am a big rider 6' 2" 300lbs. Any suggestions?
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 07:27 PM
  #2  
K9Style's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default

Mudcovered,

I have the '01 honda foreman 400, it's a great bike always up for the challange.

Starts every time no matter what the temp. I work it hard and I ride it harder, and it never
lets me down.

I'm not as big as you, but I'm no light weight 230lbs and the only bad thing I can say about
it, is that it lacks suspension. I think it's in the 5 inch range.

I've never been on a rancher, but if you look around here, all you'll read is good stuff.
Fun to ride, no problem when it comes to work.

Either way you'll be riding red, so you can't go wrong. Good luck and let us know what you get.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 07:45 PM
  #3  
Foreman4x4's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Default

I'm in the process of trying to sell my 96 Foreman 400 because I just bought a 2001 Rancher ES 4x4. The Foreman is bulletproof but you'll need a kidney belt to ride for very long, the suspension and ride quality leave a lot to be desired. The Rancher is sportier, has better ground clearance, a better front end, better suspension, floorboards, digital dash, and best of all the electric shift.

I guess I'm going to have to come up with a new user name : )
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 09:06 PM
  #4  
Need4Speed's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 825
Likes: 0
Default

I have a '95 foreman 400 it's bullet proof unless you leave it sitting on a 60 degree incline for 3 days and let it sit ther when your warming it up. I made that mistake and it cost me $900. Other then that it's great. But that was my fault
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 11:10 PM
  #5  
rancher2000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 11:15 PM
  #6  
rancher2000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Default

I imagin the the forman has a little more power.But the Rancher has it beat in all other aspects.
1-More ground clearance.
2-Better four wheel drive system
3-Digital dash
4-Better suspenion.

I would spend the extra 1k.Plus you get a waranty.


Had mine for almost a year with no problems.
 
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2001 | 11:23 PM
  #7  
idahorancher's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Default

I use my 2001 Rancher mostly for trail riding, but when we go to the cabin we work it HARD doing chores such as firewood collection. That super-low first gear comes in handy dragging fallen trees out of the mountains.
 
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2001 | 05:27 AM
  #8  
mudcovered's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Trailblazer
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Default

I have heard a lot about the Rancher ES. My original plans were to buy one. But I saw this Foreman and got to thinking. The more I think about it though, the less I like the thought of less suspension. I hope the Rancher would suit me. Right now (keep in mind how big I am) I ride a 86' 200SX. Anything would be better. Thanks for the advice everyone.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95wolv
Honda
7
Sep 27, 2024 12:00 PM
Johnny Mac
Honda
5
Aug 15, 2019 03:13 PM
mark23
Honda
5
Oct 1, 2015 09:57 AM
Clint Russell
Honda
10
Sep 25, 2015 03:20 PM
patrick.oc123
General Chat
0
Sep 15, 2015 02:45 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.