will i see any significant changes in power if i got either of theese pipes?......if so wich one gives better overall power. Also, wich one is louder, or at least sounds better. And does anyone else know of another comapny that makes a pipe for the 200x, if so.. please tell me
I am in bad need of a new pipe.
thanks
pismoguy

 

From what I hear, DG(dollar general) suck real bad. This may or may not be true but people that I have talked to,said they didn't like them. So, I'd say go for the cobra!



Icav

 

ive heard that too BUT i havnt heard anything supprisingly good about cobra except they make pipes for just about all 4 strokes ever made...so....enyone else have answers
thanks
pismoguy

 

Once upon a time I had an '85 ATC200X. My brother also had an '83 ATC200X. I had a DG Aluminum RCM and he had a 3" Supertrapp. The DG was definitely louder, but it made more power. I set my quad up with both pipes and did alternating drag runs and the DG allowed me to accelerate faster than the Supertrapp. The Supertrapp had a noticable low-end advantage, but from mid to top it was all DG. After I put a web-cam in my 200X, the thing came alive (it also had the DG pipe and K&N air filter, no lid, rejetted for sea-level).

Basically, in this case, the DG exhaust worked great, and it wasn't that expensive. It also came with a larger head pipe, which probable explains the top-end power. Although I don't recommend building up a 200X, about the most you would want to go is pipe, filter, cam... after that, reliability suffers bad.

It is, after all, just a 200X... fun, but with mediocre power!

 

ok thanks alaskaYFM

ps...how much $ was the web-cam
thanks again
pismoguy

 

I can't remember off the top of my head, I got it from James Lucky. I am pretty sure that Powroll carries that same mid-range web-cam. Check on their website, or get a James Lucky catalog.

 

alright thanks guys....anyone else?????

 

a little help please?...