Polaris Discussions about Polaris ATVs.

Scrambler 400 X vs 500

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:07 PM
  #1  
suds's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default Scrambler 400 X vs 500

Found an Scrambler 400 X for what I think is a pretty good price $6500 CAD. I kind of was thinking about buying the 500. Is there much of a difference between the two. I ride fairly aggresively but nothing overboard. I hear the 400 is lacking in bottom end power is this true or is there enough in the low rpm's to maintain slow speed power when I need it. What do all of you think about the comparison between the two machines. The one I'm looking at is a 2002 which costs $8500CAD new without taxes. Do you think the price is right. And which one is better should I pick up the 400 or hold out for the 500 .Thanx for the help.
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:09 PM
  #2  
suds's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Default Scrambler 400 X vs 500

The exchange rate for 6500 CAD is about $4340 US
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 03:57 PM
  #3  
PolarisPower500's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Default Scrambler 400 X vs 500

The 400 is a good machine but I got the 500 because I prefer low end power and a quiet, smooth running engine. I'm not a big fan of 2-stroke noise. I also think the 4-strokes start easier and last longer, that includes total engine life and the time you spend changing fouled plugs on the 2-stroke.
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 04:05 PM
  #4  
NCScrambler's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 0
Default Scrambler 400 X vs 500

I love my 400. It is not an x but, I have yet to foul a plug. The 400 In my opinion Is much faster and alot of fun, but I guess It is all up to what kind of riding you do.
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
scramxman's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default Scrambler 400 X vs 500

I have a 400X. I love it. I am 220 pounds. I have never been lacking in low end power. I do hills, lots of mud, and trails mostly. I can ride wheelies with little effort to get the front end off the ground. I don't want to slam the 500 though. I have rode one. I think it comes down to preference of 2 stroke or 4. I fel that both are equal in performance. I have not had any problems at all with plugs or anything. My dad has a 96 Trail Blazer. He just replaced the stock plug this past summer.
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2003 | 10:36 PM
  #6  
hughes's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Default Scrambler 400 X vs 500

400 all the way. Nothing beats a 2-stroke for performance. I have a 97 sport 400 and a 2003 Scrambler 500 and the 400 is a lot more fun to ride and feels a lot lighter. It is in no way lacking low-end. There are also a lot of mods for the 2-stroke. The 500 is a lot sturdier feeling machine, engine wise though. It runs a lot smoother but it seems doggy after riding the 400. They are both good machines but I would always go with a two stroke.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
exmotocrosser
Polaris
10
Sep 13, 2019 06:12 AM
Matt123
Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires
1
Sep 29, 2015 01:29 AM
exmotocrosser
Polaris
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:18 AM
Nosparkpolaris
Polaris
1
Sep 20, 2015 04:21 PM
1000gade
ATV Videos
0
Sep 9, 2015 03:35 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:45 AM.