Arctic Cat Discussions about Arctic Cat ATVs.

400 engine change

Old Jan 10, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #1  
ArcticBrat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

Why did AC change the 400 engine in 03 was there a problem with them? Has anyone owned the old liquid cooled engine and the new oil&air? If so is there any power differance, less or more time in garage?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #2  
Bear4570's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

Originally posted by: ArcticBrat
Why did AC change the 400 engine in 03 was there a problem with them? Has anyone owned the old liquid cooled engine and the new oil&air? If so is there any power differance, less or more time in garage?
They changed to the new engine because Suzuki did. The new engine is cheaper because the oil cooler is cheaper than the radiator system and the 376 engine is suppose to be stronger than the 371 engine. I wouldn't know personally as I have never run the new engine against and old 400.

 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 03:06 PM
  #3  
redryder1's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

the old 400 (371) was putting out 22 horsepower and the new 400 (376) was putting out 25 hp which everyone preferred power over the better liquid cooling system. so they said back in 03. id rather have liquid cooling myself, so thats why i upgraded to a 500. i havent heard much of any problems with either one though.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
pmkhead's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

any idea how many hp a 2000 500 is putting out?
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #5  
redryder1's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

before i bought my 2002 ac500 i checked the horsepower on all models. this is what the were in 2002:
according to my dealer who looked them up in the book.
250(246) - 12 hp
300(280) - 14 hp
400(371) - 22 hp
400(376) - 25 hp
500(492) - 30 hp
650--? wish i knew
i dont know if thats at the rear wheels or from the motor!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 06:31 PM
  #6  
redryder1's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

oh i dont know what the dvx 400(398) is putting out either. if anyone find out, id like to know . thanks
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #7  
frndinalowplace's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

im pretty sure those numbers are at the crank. I remember reading somewhere that the power output on a stock 650(633) twin was somewhere around 45 horsepower, no idea on the dvx though
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 06:38 PM
  #8  
redryder1's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

thanks frndinalowplace! i was never sure about it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #9  
pmkhead's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

thanks for the info red
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2005 | 09:26 PM
  #10  
ArcticBrat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default 400 engine change

Originally posted by: redryder1
the old 400 (371) was putting out 22 horsepower and the new 400 (376) was putting out 25 hp which everyone preferred power over the better liquid cooling system. so they said back in 03. id rather have liquid cooling myself, so thats why i upgraded to a 500. i havent heard much of any problems with either one though.
So they changed to the oil&air cool engine for more power. I see nothing wrong with the temp. they have a very large oil cooler. I've never had mine warm enough for the fan to come on. Liquid cool would just be more to go wrong would it not?
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:53 PM.