WHICH IS BETTER?? ALL INFO

 

DOESN'T ANY BODY HAVE ANY INFO. ABOUT THIS TWO MACHINES?

[This message has been edited by LT_F4WD (edited 12-14-1999).]

 

I don't have any information on the machines of interest; however, I believe some more granularity in your question might produce responses from those who do.

For example, why do you ask? From your username, you own one already. Do you want your choice validated? I assume you're not contemplating buying the other; in that case, you'd ask about it alone.

What environment and type of riding frame your question?

Are there specific areas you want to know about (e.g., traction/handling/speed)?

With the few words in your initial post, and your subsequent seeimingly demanding one, are you surprised you've received no responses?

Tree Farmer

P.S. Is your "SHIFT" key stuck?

T.F.

[This message has been edited by Tree Farmer (edited 12-14-1999).]

 

no but i use to write my details using((capslock))

 

I prefer Yamaha, but I think the drive selection gives the Suzuki the edge. Neither is a speed demon, but the timberwolf would almost have to be sportier than the "Mini Tank" LT250. It depends on what is important.

------------------
Andy Bassham *(1999 Arctic Cat 500 4x4, 1989 Honda 300)*

 

Well the Suzuki has more ground clearance, more towing capacity, a lockable front differential for true 4wd, a 3-range subtranny as opposed to the t-wolf's single range, and 2 or 4wd as opposed to full-time 4wd. In my mind the Suzuki is better.

 

The Timberwolf had such a reputation for being underpowered that Yamaha decided to replace it with the Beartracker. It is basically the same machine with improvements to the carburator and stroke to increase torque.