What kind of ATV would you guys recommend?
#11
Stalling a manual clutched machine is generally due to rider error. However, it the quad is geared high, like the TRX700xx, it IS easy to stall. Gearing it lower fixes this issue. Never had problem with stalling on any other quad. While the 400cc quads from Honda, Suzuki, and Kawasaki are all great quads, 6' 3" is pretty tall for a 400cc quad so you might feel a bit cramped. As you already know, the 450cc machines are better suited to the track and are a little more challenging to adjust the valves on since they require shims. Take your time and TEST RIDE as many machines as you can, especially the quads you are interested in.
#12
I think my back should be fine, I've done worse and come out fine haha.
I was just thinking a 450R or something similar would be a good step for me because I like things that go fast and I've read around that it can hit ~60 on the highway. And i've heard riding in general is funner on a sports quad haha.
Do you think I should go bigger than a 400 or 450?
I was just thinking a 450R or something similar would be a good step for me because I like things that go fast and I've read around that it can hit ~60 on the highway. And i've heard riding in general is funner on a sports quad haha.
Do you think I should go bigger than a 400 or 450?
#13
Your azz will tell you which one fits. Most all quads today will hit 60 mph. Not all will be comfortable for a 100 mile trail ride, many won't be great in deep mud, plowing snow, etc. I tend to think sports quad is the Miata , ATV is more of a work horse, and the UTV's are the Raptors.
#14
I have to admit that going faster sounds like a lot of fun however those sudden stops when going fast can catch up to your body real quick. I don't like the idea of getting hurt and not being able to get out and do things. A few years back a friend was out cruising on his sport bike at around 60 mph and had a tire blow out, ended up with quad out of control and flipped, broke his back. Went two years before he could ride again, and as he states....never going to go that fast on a quad again!! He now owns a utility quad and believes if he had one before his accident he never would have flipped it. Who knows.....I do know that I am not interested in going that fast...not a big fan of pain and expense!!
#15
For me speed makes little difference for my purposes.
I bought mine for icefishing (too bad the ice did't agree much this year) and some trail riding.
For trail riding I'd rather take my time & enjoy the sights compared to being on the edge while driving and having to react quickly due to high speeds.
I bought mine for icefishing (too bad the ice did't agree much this year) and some trail riding.
For trail riding I'd rather take my time & enjoy the sights compared to being on the edge while driving and having to react quickly due to high speeds.
#16
This is inaccurate information. No stock, factory quad will do much over 80 mph.
#17
And they'd fit your current needs.
#18
TA999, have you had a look at a KFX 700, also known as a V-Force ( early ones ). These are rather large sport bikes made by Kawasaki. They weigh in at about 515 pounds dry ( a tad heavy
), completely automatic, belt/clutch drive. They are quick, fairly fast ( 70mph ), wide, and long. You might have a look at one of these.
https://www.google.com/search?q=kfx7...Hb2gAPwQsAQIGw
They are considered a "sport" bike, and the final drive is shaft, but to some degree I think a bit of a mixture between sport and utility. Anyway, they fit tall guy's very well.
), completely automatic, belt/clutch drive. They are quick, fairly fast ( 70mph ), wide, and long. You might have a look at one of these. https://www.google.com/search?q=kfx7...Hb2gAPwQsAQIGw
They are considered a "sport" bike, and the final drive is shaft, but to some degree I think a bit of a mixture between sport and utility. Anyway, they fit tall guy's very well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)



