165 hp Ds for
#2
Thanks for the heads up on the drag quad.
Is it just me, or does that look like a hack job or what??? First, it looks like he rotated the motor forward about 15 degrees to fit inside the stock motor area. Thats a huge no-no. 1st rule in motor swaping, ( on anything), would be dont change the angle of the replacement motor. Major problems with oil getting to where it needs to get. Maybe Im wrong.
Secondly, I you have to check out some of the items that pop up when you type in drag banshee. Its funny. For instance, the 75 hp poopalaris scrambler 500. Apparently it runs 63 mph in 4.7 seconds. Those numbers do not jive. My Genisis HP research motor at best did 4.81 at 69 mph.
Anyway, thanks again for the heads up.
Gary
Is it just me, or does that look like a hack job or what??? First, it looks like he rotated the motor forward about 15 degrees to fit inside the stock motor area. Thats a huge no-no. 1st rule in motor swaping, ( on anything), would be dont change the angle of the replacement motor. Major problems with oil getting to where it needs to get. Maybe Im wrong.
Secondly, I you have to check out some of the items that pop up when you type in drag banshee. Its funny. For instance, the 75 hp poopalaris scrambler 500. Apparently it runs 63 mph in 4.7 seconds. Those numbers do not jive. My Genisis HP research motor at best did 4.81 at 69 mph.
Anyway, thanks again for the heads up.
Gary
#6
Jetsnow,
Ive never been blown away off the line, accept if I was sleeping. LOL and Ive raced everything.
Automatic or not, thats not gonna happen with a scrambler 500. 4.7 seconds at 63, I cant see how its possible. 60 foot times at around 1.5 seconds maybe. But that definatley wont happen. Anyway, not looking for an argument, just pointing out something.
Gary
Ive never been blown away off the line, accept if I was sleeping. LOL and Ive raced everything.
Automatic or not, thats not gonna happen with a scrambler 500. 4.7 seconds at 63, I cant see how its possible. 60 foot times at around 1.5 seconds maybe. But that definatley wont happen. Anyway, not looking for an argument, just pointing out something.
Gary
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by: omahapredator
63mph @ 5.06 sounds better.....if it was 4.7 it would be around 68-70mph
63mph @ 5.06 sounds better.....if it was 4.7 it would be around 68-70mph
#10
yes i'm planning on a low 4 sec range with mine....but with out increasing the stroke (which i con't want to do) it's probably gonna take a little nos!!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]


