Was thinking of going to a little bit bigger cam, am looking at the web 110's or the woods a1/a2 what are the real world performance differences if any. Thanks. John.

 

Bump

 

No one knows the difference between the two!!!

 

109 intake and exhaust: .425 lift, 260 duration @.050
110 intake and exhaust: .395 lift, 256 duration @.050

A1 intake: .433 lift, 267 duration @.050
A2 exhaust: .406 lift, 278 duration @.050

222

 

I was told buy a Web cam & Ron Wood dealer that the 109/110 and A1/A2 are the same, just measured different?

 

I know the specs on them, I wondered about performance difference, such as the Woods pulls harder on the top, or betteer throttle response with the webs. Thats the info I'm looking for . Thanks..

 

Just measured different?? That's funny I needed a good laugh. He sounds like a real cam expert.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]



Crazy dont waist your money on 110's. If your going to get webs get the 109/109 combo they have good throttle responce and nice overrev. The A1/A2 combo needs to be on big cubic inches or a drag bike as the are lazy down low and through the midrange but make a good peak hp number on the dyno.

 

Just measured different?? That's funny I needed a good laugh. He sounds like a real cam expert.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]



Why would he say such a thing? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]

 

Thanks for the input Mr.HP. Thats the info I was looking for [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

iv seen the 110 run and the a1a2 and i think in perf it looked about the same[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img] i noticed the bike with the 110's had good low and mid but lacked on top compaired to the a1a2. in a race they were very close! explain? the bikes were not that diff just cams.