Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires Discussions on ATV drivetrain, suspension, and tires.

Wetlands, PXT, Carlisle ACT on Rubicon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #1  
Rubmyhonda's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default Wetlands, PXT, Carlisle ACT on Rubicon

Does anybody have Wetlands on their Rubicon? If so, how do you like them? I am looking at 26x8x12 for the front and 26x10x12 for the rear. Will I notice a powerloss going to the 26" tire? Should I stick with the 25" tire? Any suggestions would be helpful. Thanks
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 03:26 AM
  #2  
jimmypsp700's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: S.E. Michigan
Default Wetlands, PXT, Carlisle ACT on Rubicon

I like them on my sp700 I didnt notice any loss going from 25" to 26" but the gearing will be slightly different.
I like them a lot.

Jim
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #3  
MikeM's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Default Wetlands, PXT, Carlisle ACT on Rubicon

I like em, rides better than stock, steers better too.

Only (minor) issue is that I tore a small corner off a few lugs, I might have run over something sharp. No leak, just a very small chunk taken out of a few lugs up the middle of a back tire. No rubbing so far. No noticable power loss as far as hills, but does not spin the tires as easily, so it may appear that it's lost power (know what I mean?). No vibration either. Got some comparison pictures posted.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 12:12 PM
  #4  
Rubmyhonda's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default Wetlands, PXT, Carlisle ACT on Rubicon

Propnut, it looks like you went with the 26"ers. Did you get 26x11x12 or 26x10x12 for the rears? How did the weight compare to your stock tires? Whould you buy a different tire now that you have tried the wetlands?
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #5  
MikeM's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 859
Likes: 0
Default Wetlands, PXT, Carlisle ACT on Rubicon

the tires are the stock width 8" front and 10" rear, but 26 inches tall. Not sure if they make a 26X11, but I know the 25" rear tire is 11" wide.

I did not have a chance to weigh them (yet). I had them mounted the day I got them and didn't have time. However, a friend still has his stock rims and tires and I might do a comparison. What I do know is that they are a heck of a lot lighter than 589s (19lbs front 23 lbs rear is what I was quoted by ITP tech line, compared to 33lbs for the rear 26X12 589)

I'll reserve judgement on whether I'd buy them again over every other tire as I've only got a couple hundred miles so far, but my friend with the 589s likes them and plans to replace his stock tires with the wetlands.

They perform as advertised and I am satisfied. I do have an easier time with mud and they were better than stock in all areas, except maybe weight, but the weight hasn't been an issue yet. They do seem to penetrate soft stuff less (or float on top more) than the stock tires or my friends 589s.

I wish I could tell you they were the best thing ever, but I don't have personal experience with every other tire out there to compare.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shimanok2
Buying an ATV
94
Jan 29, 2016 07:37 PM
patrick.oc123
Honda
2
Sep 16, 2015 03:45 AM
patrick.oc123
General Chat
0
Sep 15, 2015 02:45 PM
Ridgerunner665
Honda
8
Sep 15, 2015 01:20 AM
colt1126
Buying an ATV
3
Aug 18, 2015 10:38 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 PM.