What Is With People Doggin 400EXes!!?!?
#31
Originally posted by: ATVman00169
i think it's cuz peple now a days want new like the z-400 now yes it does have a bit more power then the 400ex but just my like a bit you know. and i agree hutchies
it seems like a lot of honda's need another gear like the big red atc. i know the yamaha warrior's got 6 now and i think it made the diffence on that quad compared to the older 5 speeds not by a lot but by some. am thinking the 400ex is one of few that can hold up to the pounden i put on em.
i think it's cuz peple now a days want new like the z-400 now yes it does have a bit more power then the 400ex but just my like a bit you know. and i agree hutchies
The only thing i wish mine had was another gear and some better shocks. Other than that can't complain. I have to agree about craptors flushing on you alot. They seem to break down everywhere I go.
The 400ex is great. For a while it was the king of the 4 stroke performance hill. I went to buy a new bike in 02 and was looking at the ex. The only problem was that the raptor was a helluva lot faster and only the ds was competition at the time. I didnt plan on racing any AMA sanctioned mx so i went with the rappy. If honda would have had something to compete, I would have taken it over the yammi or ds. Why, because hondas are bulletproof. I have owned many including 200 and 350 x trikes, a 250r trike, and 3 r's. An 86, 87, and 88. All excellent bikes.
The 400ex is a great bike, but its not in competition with the kings of the hill. the 450's, or the big bores can take one out in a blink of an eye. now when you mod them, different story. Dont let a few people tell you your quad is junk because its not the fastest. They are wrong. But just having the fastest quad doesnt make it the best...
#33
Originally posted by: arobred400
Was I talking about the 2 stroke revoulution????????????? i beleive not and if i am not mistaken i beleive honda came out with the 250r before the banshee.....yes i am right about that and we all know what the 250r did to the sport. I am talking about all of the 4 strokes that are now coming out thanks to what???? i believe the 400ex. Read my post to see where i said 4 STROKE!!!!!!!
Originally posted by: TellicoGrizz660
I think that credit goes to the Banshee!!! If it wasnt for IT would we even have sport machines???? HONDA bailed out of the sport machines when the lawsuit arose, DID YAMAHA??????? Nope Yamaha never quit making the banshee while HONDA gave up because they were scared!!!! SO YOU BEST GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT IS REALLY DUE!!!!
Originally posted by: arobred400
You dumb$hits if it werent for the 400ex wouldn't be getting all of the neew high performance quads on the market.
It STARTED the revolution of 4 stroke high performance machines. Every one can thank this quad for doing the sport a big favor.
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
Originally posted by: scramblered
simply because it was the worst thing to put that air-cooled engine in that frame,that why it make of it,the worst high performance sport quad ever built,no power,no speed.
simply because it was the worst thing to put that air-cooled engine in that frame,that why it make of it,the worst high performance sport quad ever built,no power,no speed.
It STARTED the revolution of 4 stroke high performance machines. Every one can thank this quad for doing the sport a big favor.
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
#34
Originally posted by: arobred400
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
your right about a few things...with the 400 scrammy...you can get that thing sickly fast, put out 85HP spending under 2500 for it, i dont think you can accomplish those numbers on the 400ex(built tough, built simple, but slow), and for the fact your truck weighs less than 571lbs, thats one tiny ased truck. And that tweek that auto, and you can launch, and accelerate faster than a manual, plus the auto keeps the engine in its peek HP rpm range, little more dificult with a manual(dont get me wrong, i love the manual tranny on my rm) but the auto can be tweeked with spring/weight changes in the PVT to be superior than a manual.
and for spending extra money to get a 400ex faster than a z400....just pop that much money into both quads, and poof, Z is a little faster...
#35
You probably could. With the right engine and setup it is extremely fast. And I don't mean your average 440's that are fast....take a look at sparks 465 alky 400ex motor. ever see one of these run? absolutely insanely fast
#36
Originally posted by: TellicoGrizz660
Ok the WARRIOR was around BEFORE the 400EX thank it! Also, the ONLY thing YAMAHA has to do is claim the BANSHEE is a CLOSED COURSE machine only!!! They can sell it as long as they would like!!! You think the ban on 2 strokes is gonna make all the manufacturers quit making the 2 smoker dirtbikes??? Don't think so!!! Its very simple, run down to any local dealer and ask that very same question!!! Thats all they have to do!! That was from a HONDA dealer too!!!! Alos one last thing..................THE BANSHEE is the LONGEST SELLING QUAD OF ALL TMIE!!!! HOW LONG HAVE THEY BEEN SELLING THAT MACHINE??? I WONDER WHY THAT IS! If people didnt buy them, don't you think they would quit selling them and manufacturing them!!! Really bro give YAMAHA credit then!!! Least they had the ***** to keep producing sport quads while all the other manufacturers crawled off into a corner scared!!!! NOT EVEN YOU CAN ARGUE THAT!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by: arobred400
Was I talking about the 2 stroke revoulution????????????? i beleive not and if i am not mistaken i beleive honda came out with the 250r before the banshee.....yes i am right about that and we all know what the 250r did to the sport. I am talking about all of the 4 strokes that are now coming out thanks to what???? i believe the 400ex. Read my post to see where i said 4 STROKE!!!!!!!
Originally posted by: TellicoGrizz660
I think that credit goes to the Banshee!!! If it wasnt for IT would we even have sport machines???? HONDA bailed out of the sport machines when the lawsuit arose, DID YAMAHA??????? Nope Yamaha never quit making the banshee while HONDA gave up because they were scared!!!! SO YOU BEST GIVE CREDIT WHERE IT IS REALLY DUE!!!!
Originally posted by: arobred400
You dumb$hits if it werent for the 400ex wouldn't be getting all of the neew high performance quads on the market.
It STARTED the revolution of 4 stroke high performance machines. Every one can thank this quad for doing the sport a big favor.
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
Originally posted by: scramblered
simply because it was the worst thing to put that air-cooled engine in that frame,that why it make of it,the worst high performance sport quad ever built,no power,no speed.
simply because it was the worst thing to put that air-cooled engine in that frame,that why it make of it,the worst high performance sport quad ever built,no power,no speed.
It STARTED the revolution of 4 stroke high performance machines. Every one can thank this quad for doing the sport a big favor.
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
#37
Originally posted by: Tekky
your right about a few things...with the 400 scrammy...you can get that thing sickly fast, put out 85HP spending under 2500 for it, i dont think you can accomplish those numbers on the 400ex(built tough, built simple, but slow), and for the fact your truck weighs less than 571lbs, thats one tiny ased truck. And that tweek that auto, and you can launch, and accelerate faster than a manual, plus the auto keeps the engine in its peek HP rpm range, little more dificult with a manual(dont get me wrong, i love the manual tranny on my rm) but the auto can be tweeked with spring/weight changes in the PVT to be superior than a manual.
and for spending extra money to get a 400ex faster than a z400....just pop that much money into both quads, and poof, Z is a little faster...
Originally posted by: arobred400
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
Scramblered i guess you are right you have a scrambler. They are the sickest quads ever made let me tell you. My truck is lighter than of those. I just love that automatic transmission also, it really gets you flying
your right about a few things...with the 400 scrammy...you can get that thing sickly fast, put out 85HP spending under 2500 for it, i dont think you can accomplish those numbers on the 400ex(built tough, built simple, but slow), and for the fact your truck weighs less than 571lbs, thats one tiny ased truck. And that tweek that auto, and you can launch, and accelerate faster than a manual, plus the auto keeps the engine in its peek HP rpm range, little more dificult with a manual(dont get me wrong, i love the manual tranny on my rm) but the auto can be tweeked with spring/weight changes in the PVT to be superior than a manual.
and for spending extra money to get a 400ex faster than a z400....just pop that much money into both quads, and poof, Z is a little faster...
#38
well!!!! hmmmm I guess all I can really say is I'm not the biggest fan of 4-strokes but I will agree that the 400ex is the absolut best wheelie ridden machine I've ever planted my A$$ on.....second would be the Vforce. but anyway it you were in a tight trail hare scramble the EX could stick right with any of its 400 series counter parts and this may get me in trouble because I'm already being watched but TELECOGRIZZ man you get on my nerves you my know the sport, and you may have been around for a while but give my a break YOU DON"T KNOW EVERYTHING.....and the world does not revolve around candied "YAMS"....I mean you make it sound like the other manufactures are only in buisness so yamaha has someone to beat up on....just like if you would have read the mans post he said 4-STROKE not 2-stroke...give me a break the warrior "not saying its a bad quad" but it had no influence on the new sport/race quads....so no credit will be given there. and as for the "2 smoker" remark!! why do you have to talk bs about a basic design motor that can easily produce more horse power than a complicated cammer. sorry if I have ofened anyone in here, I think each person knows what the best quad for themself is and if its yours and you like it tell everyone else to PI$$ off. I think all quads are great I just get sick of know it alls
#39
Originally posted by: killerKXF
well!!!! hmmmm I guess all I can really say is I'm not the biggest fan of 4-strokes but I will agree that the 400ex is the absolut best wheelie ridden machine I've ever planted my A$$ on.....second would be the Vforce. but anyway it you were in a tight trail hare scramble the EX could stick right with any of its 400 series counter parts and this may get me in trouble because I'm already being watched but TELECOGRIZZ man you get on my nerves you my know the sport, and you may have been around for a while but give my a break YOU DON"T KNOW EVERYTHING.....and the world does not revolve around candied "YAMS"....I mean you make it sound like the other manufactures are only in buisness so yamaha has someone to beat up on....just like if you would have read the mans post he said 4-STROKE not 2-stroke...give me a break the warrior "not saying its a bad quad" but it had no influence on the new sport/race quads....so no credit will be given there. and as for the "2 smoker" remark!! why do you have to talk bs about a basic design motor that can easily produce more horse power than a complicated cammer. sorry if I have ofened anyone in here, I think each person knows what the best quad for themself is and if its yours and you like it tell everyone else to PI$$ off. I think all quads are great I just get sick of know it alls
well!!!! hmmmm I guess all I can really say is I'm not the biggest fan of 4-strokes but I will agree that the 400ex is the absolut best wheelie ridden machine I've ever planted my A$$ on.....second would be the Vforce. but anyway it you were in a tight trail hare scramble the EX could stick right with any of its 400 series counter parts and this may get me in trouble because I'm already being watched but TELECOGRIZZ man you get on my nerves you my know the sport, and you may have been around for a while but give my a break YOU DON"T KNOW EVERYTHING.....and the world does not revolve around candied "YAMS"....I mean you make it sound like the other manufactures are only in buisness so yamaha has someone to beat up on....just like if you would have read the mans post he said 4-STROKE not 2-stroke...give me a break the warrior "not saying its a bad quad" but it had no influence on the new sport/race quads....so no credit will be given there. and as for the "2 smoker" remark!! why do you have to talk bs about a basic design motor that can easily produce more horse power than a complicated cammer. sorry if I have ofened anyone in here, I think each person knows what the best quad for themself is and if its yours and you like it tell everyone else to PI$$ off. I think all quads are great I just get sick of know it alls
Arobred400, if you were to actually have facts behind your assumptions of the ban on 2 strokes then I might feel your post was credible! However if you look up the EPA guidelines involved with the so called band on 2 strokes you will see in clear ENGLISH, that it says the BAN on 2 strokes DOES NOT and I repeat DOES NOT pertain to ATV's and DIRTBIKES that are claimed "competition use only "!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If you do not believe me, just PM KnowsAlot and ask him the same question!! Better yet here is his post in the other topic 2006 banning of 2 strokes:
"I posted the entire 2006 EPA standards as it relates to two strokes about 2 years ago when it was officially passed. I can't seem to find it using the search though.
This is basically what it outlines......
[1]There will be a strciter standard for the 2 stroke engine.
[2]All 2 strokes built prior to 2006 will not be allowed to ride in any government owned or sponsored riding area.
[3]The rules DO NOT apply to ATV or dirtbike models listed as "Competition Use Only" [CR/RM/YZ..etc,etc]
A few other things that applied to chainsaw and lawn equipment. I can't remember what. Doesn't matter to me.
So......It would be up to the OEM to decide what models stay and which go.
One model that I would look to disappear would be the KDX200 [and KDX220]
As far as quads........It would depend on whether Yamaha wants to label the Blaster and Banshee as "Pure Race" quads." - Written by KnowsAlot!
There, I think your argument has now came to an end!!


