cyclone vs. blaster
#1
08-19-2003, 01:27 AM
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#2
08-19-2003, 01:40 AM
Extreme Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
08-19-2003, 01:44 AM
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
08-19-2003, 02:07 AM
#5
08-19-2003, 04:06 AM
#7
08-19-2003, 11:54 AM
Trending Topics
#8
08-19-2003, 12:42 PM
Extreme Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
08-19-2003, 01:53 PM
Pro Rider
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cyclone vs. blaster
Trailblazerguy250, Polaris's first 4-wheeler was the 1985 Trailboss 250. I think the cyclone came out in 86 or 87. The cyclone basically had a hopped up version of the Trailboss's engine. From what I've heard the cyclone was about as fast as all of the 250's from the late 80's.
#10
08-19-2003, 02:13 PM
cyclone vs. blaster
The Cyclone used a hopped up 250 Trail Boss motor, The frame was equipped with dual rear shocks that were mounted side by side where the mono shock goes. It was not competitive with the 250R and Quadracer but aimed at the sport quad market. It still used the moronic single brake lever and was heavy. Basically it was just a Trail Boss that was stripped down, had white plastic, different clutching and porting. I would imagine that a new Trail Blazer would be faster. A Blaster would eat it up. Top speed might be close.