share everything you know about them especially speed and ponies

 

I ride with all machines, the 300ex is the best trail machine, because of its excelent handling, and suspension. The warrior is the fastest of the 3. It has good suspension, but not as good as the 300ex's. The blaster is the smallest, and if your over about 5'5 you might feel cramped...MIGHT. blaster has par suspension, and the braking system sucks. The 300ex lacks a bit' on power, but if you put a little money into it, it has alot of potential. Same goes for the blaster since its a 2 stroke.. the warrior..i have never seen modified, but im sure it also has potential

 

I have no complaints. I've never rode a Blaster but my friend has a 300EX. I noticed after I got mine sitting on his was like losing a lot of power between your legs. Then again it can be bored out and geared to wup me. My Warrior is before the motor replacement in the new Warriors so I have to admit my frontend is awfully heavy. It does have tight cornering in trails though and reverse is a lot easier than on a EX. I would buy a Warrior over a 300EX, but can't tell ya much about the Blaster.

 

HONDAHOLICX
what kind of riding do you do? rough riding? trail? drag? The 300ex is underpowerd compared to the warrior..but that does not mean everything..Just look at the magazine articals, the 300ex wins the shootouts most of the time. The warrior is a fine machine, but i like the 300 better

 

All three machines have potential, but the Blaster probably has the most since it's a two stroke. Two-strokes just seem to accept minor modifications more so than 4-strokes. The 300EX and the Warrior are great machines too. Both are bigger than the Blaster, so taller riders may not feel cramped like on the Blaster. They can be made to run like the wind if you have enough money. If you look at my mods, you can see it's not really a lot. I can tell a big difference in power over a stock 400EX though. You could probably do some of the same if you decide to get on of the 4-strokes.

 

I have a warrior and it is nice but a little heavy. My friend has a 300ex and it light better shocks than warrior. Blasters they are just basic.

 

I would go with the 300ex

 

If you look at the dyno charts from GT Thunder, the EX has 16.9 r/w hp. The warrior had 17.7 r/w hp. So the difference is less than 1 hp and 66cc's bigger. Don't even get me started on Blasters, I just don't like them and do not trust the brakes at all. Mechanical brakes on a sport quad, who thought of that.

 

This really isn't the best place to ask a question like that. In "Honda ATVs" you're bound to get more people telling you to go for a Honda. Try posting in another forum to get unbiased suggestions.

 

LOOK MAN I RIDE WITH A GUY THAT HAS A 300EX AND MY BEST FRIEND HAS A BLASTER I WAS GONNA BUY WARRIOR BEFORE I GOT MINE.SO I AM GONNA TELL U STRAIGHT UP I LOVE THE BLASTER FOR THRILLS BUT IT CANT HANG WITH THE 300 ON THE TRAILS,AND LETSFACE IT THE WARRIOR AFTER DRIVING ONE FEELS LIKE A CLASSIC YA KNOW AND PEOPLE DONT BUY CLASSICS TO GO MUDDIN SO I SAY IF U WANNA KICK UP DUST AND FLY BLASTER IF U WANNA STAY WITH EVERYBODY AND BEATEM IN THE WOODS 300 AND IF YA WANNA HAVE SOMETHIN TO LOOK AT B/C U CANT PUT IT ON THE TRAILER WITHOUT BACK PAINS WARRIOR.ITS UR CALL