the winner, the one i chose:300ex with a few mods. cheaper than the warrior but equal and better with the pipe, air filter, and jetted carb. Reverse over the blaster, bigger and badder. easier to maintain than the blaster too.

 

The 300EX is the overall choice: best handling, great power for the size and comparisons it just eats the warrior in all categories except top speed, and how often are you pinned in 5th/6th gear?? not often is the answer, with a few mods you would walk over either and still be within in the pocketbook, i dont know about a blaster not my place to call, im a 4stroke man. later

 

They have almost the same HP, but the Warrior may have more torque... there's no replacement for displacement when it comes to torque . Still, I'd go with the 300EX, because it's a Honda and because it's lighter.

 

My family owns all three of these machines.The blaster is broke right now(but so is the warrior)any the 300ex is by far the better of these machines.Not to say the warrior or blaster are no good they all have there strong points.The 300ex I would prefer in the woods and racing.The warrior I would prefer in the dunes/woods.The blaster I would prefer in the dunes only because I like 2 strokes for just ripping around. The blaster is a great machine in the woods though also.So if U are going to do all around riding I say spring for the 300ex mod it and kiss the 400ex's good bye.Just kdding it would take a lot of mods to beat a 400ex on a 300ex in a drag. which ever one of these machines u choose U will be happy.As far as speed dispite what people may say my 300ex beats my warrior in a drag and I haven't raced my blaster yet.But I had a 98 blaster that was ported,rad valve,DG pipe/silencer that would beat my 300ex in a long drag but would stay dead even on a 1/8 mile up hill drag.

www.angelfire.com/me3/fmf86trx250r/fmf86trx250r