in the future im looking to buy either a z400 or a 400ex. I've heard about problems with the frame on the z400 and wanted to kwow if susuki fixed it, how is the clutch on the z, and any other things about the z400 i know most things about the 400ex but if anyone has any input its welcomed.

 

i was posed with same question you have to weight out the qualities in both as there both awesome machines,,,the 400ex fit me most and being what i wanted to do there are the options to do so....flip a coin if you really cant make up ur mind.,lol there both equally good....

 

The first four wheeler I ever rode was a 400ex. I loved it. It was quick, and responsive. But that was five years ago. Now, when I look at the suzuki, I see that Honda was hasty and should have put more into it. The first time I got on the suzuki, I knew it was going to be a fun ride. It handled like a dream. The clutch like you asked had already been broken in, and was smooth. Now, when I compare the two of them, I would pick the suzuki. Also, the suzuki is liquid cooled, very nice. I don't now about the frame though.

 

I think the frames only crack if your doing big jumps. The z400 has a little more power and has a newer liquid cooled engine compared to the 400ex which is air cooled.

 

I bet a search on the Z400 forums will give you results. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

the z400 has a really easy pull clutch, its the easyiest ive ever felt. and same with the throttle. and i also beleive the z is DOHC and the ex is a SOHC.

 

I own a z400 and a 450r.the z400 is a great all around bike it has great low end , a good mid range and top end. it has a very plush ride and is a good jumper. the seat is very soft and the ergos. are great. I have a pro circuit full exhaust , pro flo kit k&n 170 main jet,no air box lid. the z runs pretty strong.