2003 400EX...
#2
Leave it to honda to keep turning out the same stuff year after year, they don't care what you want. They build a hell of a machine, unforunately they have never matched their previouos success from 17 years ago. I'm talking racing machines here, so no need to rant about the rock solid utes, I don't much care.
#7
AHH, so you mean just make the 250 faster than the other "250" class machines.. Honda isn't going to make the 400 faster, I'd put money on it. No reverse, either. I still believe the only reason it doenst have reverse is so they can sell the 300ex's,.
Trending Topics
#10
I wasn't aware the 250ex was one of the slowest beg. quads.. They way everybody talks about them, you'd think they were made of gold. I recently bought a 300ex for my gf, and did the usual research on mid-level sport quads. I had lots of people telling me to get a 250ex, they were "great" and "plenty fast" . LOL, whatever. The only real choices we had were a Blaster or a 300ex.. I felt 4700 bucks was a little steep for it, but I knew it would last forever, so its what I got her. I like the 400ex, its a awesome quad, but I really don't see Honda changing it. Honda isn't really in the performance game anymore, they are shooting for reliability in everything.


