Hunting, Trapping, Game Management Discuss Bow and Fire Arm Hunting.

D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:56 AM
  #11  
Reb2's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

Well, I can still see the light of day so my head must be where it belongs.
 
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #12  
MrDumass's Avatar
Super Quad Patrol
Athens Archery Field Staff
Best lunch hour ever!
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 38,878
Likes: 0
From: In Da Skys
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

I hardly doubt they want us redneck sharp shooters forming a militia, they must be mistaken! If a militia is formed, it should be to protect the people from the Gov.....aren't we a little late here?[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 03:37 AM
  #13  
gohip2000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

so is it unconstitutional for military members to live in fear of prosicution because they thought they had the right to free speech and said that they think the president is a lousy president?
I'm not trying to make a point, but am asking a question?
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 05:19 AM
  #14  
CaptainQuint's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,448
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

People in the military do give up certain rights when they enlist and they're also bound the Uniform Code Of Military Justice. The President being the Comander In Chief would be your superior officer I would assume you would be under some obligation as to your actions and your choice of words. Someone more familiar with teh actual regulations would have to chime in on that though.

Given what active duty personel say on a regular basis on the record about the sitting President I don't know what you would have to say to actually be prosecuted for anything. As far as I know no one ever has been.
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #15  
gohip2000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

It is in the UCMJ. (you can not slander your superiors)
I was unaware that I couldn't talk with my buddies on my own time and give my opinion about the president, but I was soon confronted the next day, after someone overheard me talking to my buddies, and was told that if anything negative about the president came out of my mouth again, I would get an article 15 and loose a months pay
 
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #16  
squeege's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

Originally posted by: gohip2000
It is in the UCMJ. (you can not slander your superiors)
I was unaware that I couldn't talk with my buddies on my own time and give my opinion about the president, but I was soon confronted the next day, after someone overheard me talking to my buddies, and was told that if anything negative about the president came out of my mouth again, I would get an article 15 and loose a months pay
THAT BLOWS
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 01:10 AM
  #17  
User492's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,641
Likes: 1
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

Originally posted by gohip2000: It is in the UCMJ. (you can not slander your superiors)
I was unaware that I couldn't talk with my buddies on my own time and give my opinion about the president, but I was soon confronted the next day, after someone overheard me talking to my buddies, and was told that if anything negative about the president came out of my mouth again, I would get an article 15 and loose a months pay


It is highly unlikely that you would be punished for comments made in private. However, if you are speaking in a loud voice in a crowded chow hall, than it's hardly private. The one time that I know of a military person actually get punished for comments made about a sitting president was when an air force officer made a statement in a public format. Of course, that was about clinton, and many would consider bush fair game.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 09:37 PM
  #18  
gohip2000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

You have to remember that not all SGTs use their power as they should. some just like to flex their power and the SGT that told me that was like that. Most people wouldn't care, but he butted into the conversation and threatened me with UCMJ.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 11:31 PM
  #19  
deanz400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 2
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias


As a member in the Army Reserves ,a private conversation is still a private one ,but put an opinion piece in the local paper then your talking something differant.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 08:56 AM
  #20  
gohip2000's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default D.C. Argues Gun Rights Only For Militias

As a former member of Active Duty Army I can say
reserve is a little different than active duty. Active duty, you can be called at any time 24/7 to be put on a detail or you can be punished at any time also.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.