I recently searched the kawasaki forum and typed the word blaster in. There were quite a few posts about mojave v.s blaster. I was shocked by the way people were dissing blasters. I'm sorry but stock for stock the blaster is faster than the mojave. with rider weight being the same and rider skill being the same the blaster is faster. sure an experienced mojave rider might smoke a person on a blaster that doesn't have much experience but all of yall always brag whenever you beat a person on a blaster. Don't yall have anything else to post about.

 

by the way blasters aren't all that small and they are actually pretty reliable.

 

so wait a second you make a post about baist people and yet your baist. i believe a quads a quad and we are all lucky to enjoy so much fun together.

 

i ride a mojave and i wouldn't even compare a blaster and a mojave. there in totally different catagories. mainly 2 stroke and then 4 stroke. they both have there pros and cons.

 

YA the blaster is junk tho for a 200cc 2-strock!
i mean it shoudl be smoking 400exs not getting beat buy a slightly modded mojave!

 

Biased. <- sorry, spelling police.

 

haha thats funny because I was on time on a mojave with just a slip on K&N and the blaster had a twin air airbox filter and I beat him in 1/4 mile,1/2 mile and up a sand hill, he beat me in the 1 mile race because he had a 6th gear and was 25some pounds less then me and his quad is lighter then the one i was on too

 

ya i guess mojaves are just way better than blasters. oh well!

 

TRUE DAT!

mojaves are more reliable because there 4 stroke and because te blaster is oil injected but if the oil injection is removed id show more credit for it

and I have an old trimoto 175 blown up and i looked over the motor and is some of the components on the 175 same as the blaster? some of the parts look like there are blaster motor parts but that was awy off topic

 

Ya i beleave that the mojave is way more reliable! I mean they are pretty awsom!