Kawasaki Discussions about Kawasaki ATVs.

Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 06-08-2005, 07:43 PM
Daranello75's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Originally posted by: kawasaskirules
daranello......stop popping a boner over the bomb 800 please everything time u post its always about the 800 bomb..
lol, just wait untill I get one
 
  #12  
Old 06-08-2005, 09:09 PM
kawasaskirules's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

LOL ahahah
 
  #13  
Old 06-09-2005, 09:58 AM
VTprairie's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

you can add a 4 year extended warranty for 375 bucks from the mule barn as I did so the extra warranty is not that expansive if you are worreid about it
 
  #14  
Old 06-10-2005, 11:42 AM
700vtwinman's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baytown Texas
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Here is my take on the 750BF vs. KQ700efi:

1. Fuel Consumption: KQ700 is better
2. Horse Power: BF750 has more
3. Torque: BF750 has more
4. Layout: Both are very nice
5. Mudding: Both can be awesome with good mud tires. I believe the BF750 has slightly more GC
6. Reliability: Both are top notch
7. Quickness: BF750
8. Top Speed: BF750 slightly
9. Off Camber: Both are ok, but KQ is better comparing stock vs. stock
10. Jumping: I have not clue on this one
11. Comfort: Both are nice
12. Tranny: Both are good and about the same. I believe the KQ might be geared lower in low range.
 
  #15  
Old 09-08-2005, 01:48 PM
budlyte's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

I rode a Brute 750 last weekend and was not impressed with the handling or the comfort. I put about 35 miles on it and could not wait to get back on my Prairie 650. The Brute felt tippy and the ride was none too soft for an IRS machine. I tried changing the pre-load on the shocks, but it didn't help. I finally bought a new King Quad yesterday ($6300 OTD) and I couldn't be happier. Great ride, nice handling, and EFI to boot. Hopefully Kawi improves the ride on the Brute (and on any other IRS models they may be coming out with).

Just my 2 cents[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
  #16  
Old 09-08-2005, 08:29 PM
1fatcat's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

I think all these quads have insane power and there is no REAL reason any of them can't do what you want... So when I was looking it was the BF750, KQ, and the Grizzly...

I rode all, took a month to decide, heard the loyals stay loyal, and the sales people say they were all good...

For me ..
1. Price - End of year 2005 model BF750's solid colors were $6250 ish in my area
2. Maintenance - All the service shops said the KQ would cost more to service ..(not Oil changes but major ..)
3. Comfort... - All felt about the same to me 6' 0" 260 ish ... BF fit me the best
4. Instument placement - Felt the Kawi had the best - Forgot but I think the Grizzly was my least favorable. Did like the KQ item holder ..
5. Looks - Like the BF the best...

I am just an average consumer so all the power, torque, towing, plowing is just ansillary to me...(and within reason for all) AT the end of the day I wanted a good work quad for my uncles ranch, that I could take hunting, and trail ride when I camp...Cheapest price most bang for the buck.. (Probably should have saved some money and bought a used Honda [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 
  #17  
Old 09-12-2005, 12:01 AM
Auggies's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

A friend of mine and I went out and bought new quads, I bought the 750 brute, and he bought the 700 King quad. We have ridden each othes quads and let me tell you what we found. The KQ feels doggy off the line and the brute is real snappy. Now here is the interesting part though, when we raced, we were side by side up to 70 mph, so since I am a bigger guy, we switched quads, and then we raced again. The results were the exact same. I am not sure why but the KQ feels alot slower but in reality it is not. There has only been one time when I went a little faster, and that was on the highway (thank god we didn't get caught), and I could run about 2 mph faster than him. However, the KQ does handle better, but, the KQ is already in getting a new tranny since reverse is out of it. He has 130 miles on it. The dealer told us that there is an inherent problem with reverse on these. The understanding I got was that it would be like 01 raptors where everyone will have to put in a tranny
 
  #18  
Old 09-12-2005, 10:54 AM
Rusroc's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

budlyte, if you got that price, that was a great deal. In east Texas all the Suzuki shops want MSRP + set up. I got my BF for $600 less than I could get a KQ for. I got the warranty for $375.
 
  #19  
Old 09-12-2005, 09:56 PM
biohaZ's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Im gonna try to compare them all..

Fuel- KQ700
Quickness- SP800.. it is the quickest quad out to 25 i believe.. it even beats the brute
Fastest- BF750
Top speed- im sure there all around the same up in the 70's
Comfort- Im gonna go with the Sp800, with the king not far behind
Handing- KQ, Sp800 not far behind, Brute a ways behind.
Mudding- Sp800
Realible- There all pretty reliable
Work Horse- Sp800
Looks- I like the look of the KQ [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
Storage- SP800

All of them is a great choice, you just have to find what you like the best, goto a dealer and ride them
Sp800- Work horse, quick, Plush, EFI
BF750- Fast, Tippy, Sport quad like
KQ700- is above average in everything, but lacks the speed of the BF and SP, EFI

in my opinion the Sp800 would suit me right

Take your pick.

 
  #20  
Old 09-14-2005, 07:00 PM
300ex90's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

You should go with the sportsman 800 its very comfortable and it handles great yes its only a 760cc but its EFI and dual exaust! i hear on the BF 750 the IRS sucks and dont even think about the brp 800 i mean its a bombardier junk
 


Quick Reply: Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:47 AM.