Kawasaki Discussions about Kawasaki ATVs.

Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 11:56 AM
  #1  
hollowcd's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

First of all I want to say that I am not trying to start a battle. I want opinions because I am getting ready to drop $7,000 on a Quad and I want to ride the best. I have been looking at 3 quads, the Brute Force 750, the Suzuki King Quad 700 EFI, and the Polaris Sportsman 800 Twin EFI. I have asked a number dealerships to compare the Brute Force to the other two quads and most wont say anything negative about the competitor. This in a way is good, I am glad that the dealer is respecting the other brands, but at the same time it is hard for a buyer to find the advantages/disadvantages of one quad over another. The only opinion that I was given was from a kid yesterday that sells Kawi's and Suzuki's. He said that the King Quad would smoke a Brute force in every aspect, race, mud, handling, everything. I reminded him that the KQ was a single cylinder and he was comparing it to a V-twin with more CC's but he said that didnt matter. He also said that the Polaris was powerful, but behind in the quality department.

I know that most of the people selling these big bores however, probably dont even ride themselves. This is why I am posting on here, I want some feedback from new owners, old owners, owners that switched brands, and whay you did. Like I said, I dont want a war, I just want facts. I am going to post this on the Polaris and Suzuki website also to get a broad spectrum of opinions/facts. Thanks for the info guys, I appreciate it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
GoatManx's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

A KQ smoke a brute force in every aspect? lol

The brute flat out has more power than any big bore CURRENTLY out. All that power with the weight around 600 pounds makes it a wheelie machine. This also comes in handey when you get into the thick mud or when you start throwing on larger tires. Saying a KQ would walk all a brute in every aspect is rediculous and from someone who doesn't know what hes talking about. They're two different beast and each good in their own way.

As for the 800 it has alot of power but it also has a good bit more weight and well that alone turned me away from it so i do not know much about it.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 01:05 PM
  #3  
Daranello75's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

wait and get the BRP Outlander Twin 800 EFI, a true 800CC big bore v-twin. This big beast packs a 62HP, 52lbs torque monster twin cylinder Rotax engine, by far the most powerful ATV on the market.

If you're looking to translate that to pure speed, BRP claims the Outlander 800 has 28% more rear wheel speed (as measured by Matech Technologie Inc rear wheel dyno) than the Polaris, 25% more than the BruteForce, and 54% more than the King Quad

 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 01:34 PM
  #4  
jawyatt's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Everyone said that the p800 would beat the BF and it didnt and now they say the new 800 will beat it too. We will just have to wait to see how fast this thing really is. I still believe in my 750 and cant wait to race one.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #5  
Daranello75's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Originally posted by: jawyatt
Everyone said that the p800 would beat the BF and it didnt and now they say the new 800 will beat it too. We will just have to wait to see how fast this thing really is. I still believe in my 750 and cant wait to race one.
yah, but the SP800 is Fat Pig and not a real 800!
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 02:04 PM
  #6  
jawyatt's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Your right about the p800 but the new b800 is heavy too. I dont know it sounds like its gonna be a great bike but only time will tell.
 
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 05:02 PM
  #7  
prairie650and700's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

The new Bomb is not at all heavy they are about 640 lbs that is light if it really does have the power they claim. It is especially light if you compare it to the SP800 or 650 Bombs!
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 05:07 PM
  #8  
alltoos's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

the new bomb is supposed to have a $8999.00 price tag on it. that translates to neerly $2000.00 more than a brute 750. that , in my eye's comes to a no brainer on wich one to purchase.(take in mind you will not get a deal on one of the bombs when they first come out).
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #9  
Daranello75's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

Originally posted by: alltoos
the new bomb is supposed to have a $8999.00 price tag on it. that translates to neerly $2000.00 more than a brute 750. that , in my eye's comes to a no brainer on wich one to purchase.(take in mind you will not get a deal on one of the bombs when they first come out).
Well its $1400 diff and only $400 more than the SP800, but thats only IF it really has a price tag of $8999. beside by the time you put new shocks on the brute, NO EFI, smaller motor, 3 year warranty VS. 6months its not that bad!
 
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #10  
kawasaskirules's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 1
Default Brute Force 750 vs King Quad 700 EFI

daranello......stop popping a boner over the bomb 800 please everything time u post its always about the 800 bomb..
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.