Renegade 800 vs. Outlander 800 vs. Brute Force 750 review with video
#1
02-12-2007, 10:41 AM
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Renegade 800 vs. Outlander 800 vs. Brute Force 750 review with video
I finally received my new Renegade 800 and after getting about 60 miles seat time on it and some break-in on it I wanted to do a litte race to show the results. Accept for the renegade that is only a week old I have rode them all on quite a few different rides and trips and have a lot of seat time to base my opinion on.
As far as how it stacks in up against a brute force and an outlander I would say the power is just slightly better than the outlander but feels almost the same which is a good thing also means it has quite a bit more than a brute force. The ride and suspension is not quite as plush and soft as the outlander and about the same the brute which means it has soaks up the landings better than the outlander which definately seems soft to me jumping. The renegade's steering feels nice and light like the outlander and don't push like the brute accept in snow the holeshot's don't cut the best. The seat and ergo feels very outlander like and as far as the display goes it has the side by side digital tach/speedometer which I like even better than the outlander's and you can't go wrong with the EFI starts instead of the cold blooded nature of the carbeurated machines.
Obviously it skimps on mud coverage but other than that and the Holeshot ATR's which don't seem very puncture resistant being they have 3 plugs in them already. I did manage to get some videos the Renegade 800 and the 2006 Outlander 800 are completely stock including tires and the Brute Force 750 has a dynatek CDI with 25" Mudlite XL's. I am on the renegade and my brother that was riding the outlander and the brute weighs 75lbs less than me and all of the races in the field are in 4wd and the races on the road were in 2wd.
Neither of the 800's stay down real well when you launch which is a nice feature to have but also turns out my tire was real low which made the renegade pull to the left which explains that. Here is the video.
Renegade 800 vs. Outlander 800 vs. Brute Force 750
As far as how it stacks in up against a brute force and an outlander I would say the power is just slightly better than the outlander but feels almost the same which is a good thing also means it has quite a bit more than a brute force. The ride and suspension is not quite as plush and soft as the outlander and about the same the brute which means it has soaks up the landings better than the outlander which definately seems soft to me jumping. The renegade's steering feels nice and light like the outlander and don't push like the brute accept in snow the holeshot's don't cut the best. The seat and ergo feels very outlander like and as far as the display goes it has the side by side digital tach/speedometer which I like even better than the outlander's and you can't go wrong with the EFI starts instead of the cold blooded nature of the carbeurated machines.
Obviously it skimps on mud coverage but other than that and the Holeshot ATR's which don't seem very puncture resistant being they have 3 plugs in them already. I did manage to get some videos the Renegade 800 and the 2006 Outlander 800 are completely stock including tires and the Brute Force 750 has a dynatek CDI with 25" Mudlite XL's. I am on the renegade and my brother that was riding the outlander and the brute weighs 75lbs less than me and all of the races in the field are in 4wd and the races on the road were in 2wd.
Neither of the 800's stay down real well when you launch which is a nice feature to have but also turns out my tire was real low which made the renegade pull to the left which explains that. Here is the video.
Renegade 800 vs. Outlander 800 vs. Brute Force 750
#2
02-12-2007, 05:57 PM
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)