I'd like to Salute the State of Arizona.
#51
Problem is there's a lot of right wing nut jobs the actually believe it to be true. I've never seen so many venomous souls with demented beliefs while watching clips of their rallies. You never saw that kind of thing from the left.....showing up at rallies with side arms. Some crazy $hit on the right and Beck fanning the flames for personal gain is beyond belief. Like I said earlier, if he could get a bigger audience on the left, he jump that way for bigger ratings. He's simply found a niche for himself. Suddenly he's Mr. religious talking about God all the time. Strange stuff. Who on the left could you even remotely compare this dude to, with his goofy talk and whacked out looks. He's just a TV personality at best.
For the record, I've said before that it really bothered me when I saw signs of Bush as Hitler. Foolishness at best.
Contract with American 2.0 should go over well......
Funny how we end up down the same road of conversation regardless of the thread title. Good stuff
For the record, I've said before that it really bothered me when I saw signs of Bush as Hitler. Foolishness at best.
Contract with American 2.0 should go over well......
Funny how we end up down the same road of conversation regardless of the thread title. Good stuff

#52
Obama has sent the National Guard to the border. Does he get any credit.....apparently not. McCain wants more troops, maybe more are needed, but it's funny how "spending" and the two other wars going on are so easily forgotten in an election year. Apparently the drones, troops, supplies, and logistics are all free.
#53
$12,000 a minute I just read on NPR. I would not dare to even consider disrepecting our men and women in uniform, this is a policy issue, not a service issue. I know, we are in a pickle here, but Medicare is killing us, really? It costs nothing compared to the war bill. "W" made government bigger by more than any other administration, by a lot, so is it a party issue? The war appropriation vote is an any day now thing. Voting against it is political suicide, and maybe there is reason for that, but voting for it is spending far more than any 10 other contexts combined, hell, maybe even any 100 other contexts combined. You are all justified in your fear of our national debt, for damn sure, me too. But the causes are not always what the made for ratings news agencies report. Real smaller government folks would have never gone into a war in Iraq. The other war? Maybe. You could could make a a national security issue out of that one. It becomes a philosophical issue... Never a good type of issue when it comes to war.
Unless it has to do with hate spin. A classic, mind you. Been done fore ever. A graet documentatary came out about 15-20 years ago called "Faces of the Enemy." All about how demonizing a group of people made it so much more plausible to round them onto train cars headed to death camps or forcing them to internsment camps here at home. Bush/Obama... who cares. It is NEVER OK to make a comparison to someone like Hitler unless there really is reason to do so, AND, thanks to our people and process, we have never had reason to be worried about said. GO US! But, be careful, PLEASE!
Hate is hate. Nothing good can ever come from it.
Unless it has to do with hate spin. A classic, mind you. Been done fore ever. A graet documentatary came out about 15-20 years ago called "Faces of the Enemy." All about how demonizing a group of people made it so much more plausible to round them onto train cars headed to death camps or forcing them to internsment camps here at home. Bush/Obama... who cares. It is NEVER OK to make a comparison to someone like Hitler unless there really is reason to do so, AND, thanks to our people and process, we have never had reason to be worried about said. GO US! But, be careful, PLEASE!
Hate is hate. Nothing good can ever come from it.
#54
The spending, the spinning of it all will go on forever.
Until someone in charge has the gonads to actually say, "Hey, we already have laws on the books, and I'm going to enforce them".
Until someone in charge has the gonads to actually say, "Hey, we already have laws on the books, and I'm going to enforce them".
#55
Exactly. Arizona's frustration is being on the receiving end of an unenforced or under-enforced federal law and it's citizens are paying the price for the lack. I don't live on a border state and don't want to. My sister lived in one of the border towns and got fed up. Not everyone can just pack up and leave. If you are a US citizen you shouldn't have to for this reason.
#57
Hi Moose,
And to all else (Scooter et. al),
I don't actually undestand. Are you saying more government or less? Make more laws, just the ones I want, but be smaller? That is a conundrum of the highest possible regard? Be smaller, be Reagan, but DO NOT stop over legislating? Moose, you live in the most over legislated state in the US IMO. Mine is probabaly a close 2nd though (NJ). Reagan didn't mean this. Agree or disagree, he was a real smaller government person, hell, just look at his high court nominations. This is a real ideological president not a ***** to the latest shock jock theme show. And I am no Reagan fan policy wise, just respect his vision and charisma.
Wanting a less government but more social regulation of "the mores I subscribe to" is truly oxymoronic and clearly NOT conservative, other than from a ratings TV show perspective. Less government is LESS GOVERNMENT. I get your argument and it has its merits. Just stop confusing it with "add more government, but just the stuff I want government" part.
You have, AND SHOULD HAVE, every freakin right to be in "Operation Rescue." Agree or not, I'd be out in the street demonstrating for your right to be. See Voltaire...
And BTW, thanks for your civic participation. Whatever your perspective. We are not all enjoying our democracy enough IMO.
On another thread note... I don't care who is being portrayed as Hitler. Hate stuff is bad, period. Always. This is no joke, demonizing anyone is just wrong. No one people fit one single group... De-sensitizing us to hate toward a group of people can never be a good thing. Never.
And to all else (Scooter et. al),
I don't actually undestand. Are you saying more government or less? Make more laws, just the ones I want, but be smaller? That is a conundrum of the highest possible regard? Be smaller, be Reagan, but DO NOT stop over legislating? Moose, you live in the most over legislated state in the US IMO. Mine is probabaly a close 2nd though (NJ). Reagan didn't mean this. Agree or disagree, he was a real smaller government person, hell, just look at his high court nominations. This is a real ideological president not a ***** to the latest shock jock theme show. And I am no Reagan fan policy wise, just respect his vision and charisma.
Wanting a less government but more social regulation of "the mores I subscribe to" is truly oxymoronic and clearly NOT conservative, other than from a ratings TV show perspective. Less government is LESS GOVERNMENT. I get your argument and it has its merits. Just stop confusing it with "add more government, but just the stuff I want government" part.
You have, AND SHOULD HAVE, every freakin right to be in "Operation Rescue." Agree or not, I'd be out in the street demonstrating for your right to be. See Voltaire...
And BTW, thanks for your civic participation. Whatever your perspective. We are not all enjoying our democracy enough IMO.
On another thread note... I don't care who is being portrayed as Hitler. Hate stuff is bad, period. Always. This is no joke, demonizing anyone is just wrong. No one people fit one single group... De-sensitizing us to hate toward a group of people can never be a good thing. Never.
#58
QUOTE: the Feds are issuing a terror warning for the Texas-Mexico boarder.
US immigration and national security are one issue. How the Obama Administration can be so derelict in their duties is beyond words.
You can’t have it both ways folks. Nice to see that Napolitano and DHS read the terror warning first.
DO YOUR JOB OBAMA AND PROTECT AMERICA!
FED Issue Terror Warning For Texas-Mexico Border, But Arizona Law is Misguided? | Scared Monkeys
The Department of Homeland Security is alerting Texas authorities to be on the lookout for a suspected member of the Somalia-based Al Shabaab terrorist group who might be attempting to travel to the U.S. through Mexico, a security expert who has seen the memo tells FOXNews.com.
The warning follows an indictment unsealed this month in Texas federal court that accuses a Somali man in Texas of running a “large-scale smuggling enterprise” responsible for bringing hundreds of Somalis from Brazil through South America and eventually across the Mexican border. Many of the illegal immigrants, who court records say were given fake IDs, are alleged to have ties to other now-defunct Somalian terror organizations that have merged with active organizations like Al Shabaab, al-Barakat and Al-Ittihad Al-Islami.
So at the same time that Janet Napoliano & the Home Land Security Agency are criticizing the new immigration law put in place in Arizona that could potentially catch terrorists as well as illegals, they now issue a terror warning stating that Somalian terrorists could be sneaking across the Mexican-US border. WHAT!!!The warning follows an indictment unsealed this month in Texas federal court that accuses a Somali man in Texas of running a “large-scale smuggling enterprise” responsible for bringing hundreds of Somalis from Brazil through South America and eventually across the Mexican border. Many of the illegal immigrants, who court records say were given fake IDs, are alleged to have ties to other now-defunct Somalian terror organizations that have merged with active organizations like Al Shabaab, al-Barakat and Al-Ittihad Al-Islami.
US immigration and national security are one issue. How the Obama Administration can be so derelict in their duties is beyond words.
You can’t have it both ways folks. Nice to see that Napolitano and DHS read the terror warning first.
DO YOUR JOB OBAMA AND PROTECT AMERICA!
FED Issue Terror Warning For Texas-Mexico Border, But Arizona Law is Misguided? | Scared Monkeys
#59
Hi Moose,
And to all else (Scooter et. al),
I don't actually undestand. Are you saying more government or less? Make more laws, just the ones I want, but be smaller? That is a conundrum of the highest possible regard? Be smaller, be Reagan, but DO NOT stop over legislating? Moose, you live in the most over legislated state in the US IMO. Mine is probabaly a close 2nd though (NJ). Reagan didn't mean this. Agree or disagree, he was a real smaller government person, hell, just look at his high court nominations. This is a real ideological president not a ***** to the latest shock jock theme show. And I am no Reagan fan policy wise, just respect his vision and charisma.
Wanting a less government but more social regulation of "the mores I subscribe to" is truly oxymoronic and clearly NOT conservative, other than from a ratings TV show perspective. Less government is LESS GOVERNMENT. I get your argument and it has its merits. Just stop confusing it with "add more government, but just the stuff I want government" part.
You have, AND SHOULD HAVE, every freakin right to be in "Operation Rescue." Agree or not, I'd be out in the street demonstrating for your right to be. See Voltaire...
And BTW, thanks for your civic participation. Whatever your perspective. We are not all enjoying our democracy enough IMO.
On another thread note... I don't care who is being portrayed as Hitler. Hate stuff is bad, period. Always. This is no joke, demonizing anyone is just wrong. No one people fit one single group... De-sensitizing us to hate toward a group of people can never be a good thing. Never.
And to all else (Scooter et. al),
I don't actually undestand. Are you saying more government or less? Make more laws, just the ones I want, but be smaller? That is a conundrum of the highest possible regard? Be smaller, be Reagan, but DO NOT stop over legislating? Moose, you live in the most over legislated state in the US IMO. Mine is probabaly a close 2nd though (NJ). Reagan didn't mean this. Agree or disagree, he was a real smaller government person, hell, just look at his high court nominations. This is a real ideological president not a ***** to the latest shock jock theme show. And I am no Reagan fan policy wise, just respect his vision and charisma.
Wanting a less government but more social regulation of "the mores I subscribe to" is truly oxymoronic and clearly NOT conservative, other than from a ratings TV show perspective. Less government is LESS GOVERNMENT. I get your argument and it has its merits. Just stop confusing it with "add more government, but just the stuff I want government" part.
You have, AND SHOULD HAVE, every freakin right to be in "Operation Rescue." Agree or not, I'd be out in the street demonstrating for your right to be. See Voltaire...
And BTW, thanks for your civic participation. Whatever your perspective. We are not all enjoying our democracy enough IMO.
On another thread note... I don't care who is being portrayed as Hitler. Hate stuff is bad, period. Always. This is no joke, demonizing anyone is just wrong. No one people fit one single group... De-sensitizing us to hate toward a group of people can never be a good thing. Never.
On the activism front, I'm not a demonstrator in the least. I write letters, send email, make phone calls, but don't consider myself a demonstrator. The reason we can is the Constitutional guarantee to peacefully assemble for redress of grievences. The demonization of the Tea Party and how it is ridiculed makes me wonder how afraid some politcians are of an educated voter.
I've seen comparisons of Hitler's methodology and Obama's and there things that need to be brought out. Especially when you look into his cabinet member's views. This is, again, bringing out what they themselves have said in speeches, and in writing.
#60
M-
Confused?
"On the other hand, the head of the National Orginization of Woman in Mass. decked my wife. I saw our people kicked, bones dislocated, personally spit on and kicked, cracked ribs, and other injuries."
This certainly made me think you were a "demonstator." I thought it would be a source of pride? Heck, grandmothers and mothers in Chile just wouldn't stop "demonstrating" about their loved being missing or detained for years and it ultimately worked and was a huge part of the ouster of the torturous Pinochet regime. It is critically important.
"I've seen comparisons of Hitler's methodology and Obama's and there things that need to be brought out. Especially when you look into his cabinet member's views. This is, again, bringing out what they themselves have said in speeches, and in writing."
Obama's cabinet members want to exterminate 6 million jews? I'll take this as sarcasm. Anything else is just too depressing to deal with. Bush, Obama, I don't care, this is a dangerous and horrific comparison. The thought of people actually taking it seriously is horrifying.
I know a PhD and liturgical scholar of the highest order (very well). He will, to make a point, offer people 2 passages and ask which is from the bible. They always guess wrong. When he turns the book over they guessed was the bible it is Mein Kampf. He does this just to make a point that pretty much anything can be made to sound like anything. So be careful, that is his message.
So LOL.
Confused?
"On the other hand, the head of the National Orginization of Woman in Mass. decked my wife. I saw our people kicked, bones dislocated, personally spit on and kicked, cracked ribs, and other injuries."
This certainly made me think you were a "demonstator." I thought it would be a source of pride? Heck, grandmothers and mothers in Chile just wouldn't stop "demonstrating" about their loved being missing or detained for years and it ultimately worked and was a huge part of the ouster of the torturous Pinochet regime. It is critically important.
"I've seen comparisons of Hitler's methodology and Obama's and there things that need to be brought out. Especially when you look into his cabinet member's views. This is, again, bringing out what they themselves have said in speeches, and in writing."
Obama's cabinet members want to exterminate 6 million jews? I'll take this as sarcasm. Anything else is just too depressing to deal with. Bush, Obama, I don't care, this is a dangerous and horrific comparison. The thought of people actually taking it seriously is horrifying.
I know a PhD and liturgical scholar of the highest order (very well). He will, to make a point, offer people 2 passages and ask which is from the bible. They always guess wrong. When he turns the book over they guessed was the bible it is Mein Kampf. He does this just to make a point that pretty much anything can be made to sound like anything. So be careful, that is his message.
So LOL.







