OHV Riders Rights and also Politics This forum is for political and open discussions only. Do not enter here unless you are willing to disagree with the statements made. What happens in this forum stays in this forum.

One of many reasons Romney won't get my vote.

Old Jun 15, 2012 | 10:24 AM
  #31  
scootergptx's Avatar
Supersock
Hired Gun!
"Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!"
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 142,526
Likes: 182
From: Land of the misfit toys
Default

Originally Posted by scrambler400enoge
I'm just trying to effect real change. Romney or Obama will do neither. It's a vote for none of the above, not one or the other.
If that gives you a warm fuzzy feeling, then justify it all you want.

But guess which crowd will be bitching the most when obama gets reelected.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:44 PM
  #32  
scrambler400enoge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Shapeshifter Rider
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
From: Mishawaka,Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Scootergptx
If that gives you a warm fuzzy feeling, then justify it all you want.

But guess which crowd will be bitching the most when obama gets reelected.
You will. Republicans will blame libertarians for "Splitting the Vote" Like Ross Perot.


Difference is The house and senate has and will continue filling up with Ron Paul and Gary Johnson style republicans. Ross Perot Didn't have that support.These RINO's we have now that masquerade about reducing spending but add to the debt at record levels and beat the war drums, like there Democratic counterparts.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #33  
scrambler400enoge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Shapeshifter Rider
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
From: Mishawaka,Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by beergut
6 reasons why liberals dont understand the world.

1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal's mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone's liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you're not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results. Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it's designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn't work and wastes billions. A ban on DDT makes liberals feel good about themselves because they're "protecting the environment" even though millions of people have died as a result. For liberals, it's not what a program does in the real world; it's about whether they feel better about themselves for supporting it.

3) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that's wrong is saying that there's an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering "why they hate us" because they feel incapable of saying, “That's wrong," and doing something about it. If you're against firm standards and condemning immoral behavior, then your moral compass won’t work and you’ll also be for immorality, as well as societal and cultural decay by default.

4) Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world -- and he's challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who've banded together because individually they're powerless. If you listen to the liberal rhetoric, you might think Barack Obama was a black Republican being surrounded by a KKK lynching party 100 years ago -- as opposed to the single most powerful man in America abusing the authority of his office to attack ordinary Tea Partiers who have the audacity to speak the truth to power for the good of their country.

5) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who's at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you're dirt poor, starving, and haven't worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state? Conservatives would tend to say the former in each case, while liberals would tend to say the latter. But when you disconnect what an individual does from the results that happen in his life, it's very difficult to understand cause and effect in people's lives.

6) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal. To many liberals, all one needs to do to be wise, intelligent, compassionate, open minded, and sensitive is to BE LIBERAL. In other words, many of the good things about a person spring not from his actions, but from the ideology he holds. This has an obvious appeal. You can be a diehard misogynist, but plausibly call yourself a feminist, hate blacks, but accuse others of racism, have a subpar IQ and be an intellectual, give nothing to charity and be compassionate, etc., etc., and all you have to do is call yourself a liberal. It's a shortcut to virtue much like the corrupt old idea of religious indulgences. Why live a life of virtue when you could live a sinful life and buy your way into heaven? If you're a liberal, why actually live a life of virtue when you can merely call yourself a liberal and get credit for being virtuous, even when you've done nothing to earn it?
You should Read up on Classic Liberalism and Neo Conservatism.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #34  
scootergptx's Avatar
Supersock
Hired Gun!
"Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!"
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 142,526
Likes: 182
From: Land of the misfit toys
Default

Now I now how you got your nickname.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:17 PM
  #35  
scrambler400enoge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Shapeshifter Rider
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
From: Mishawaka,Indiana
Default

Presidential Election Results from 1992 and 1996
Year `````` Perot `````````` Republican Candidate ``````` Democrat Candiate
1992 `````` 19,743,821 ````` 39,104,550 ``````````````` 44,909,806
1996 `````` 8,085,294 `````` 39,197,469 ``````````````` 47,401,185

Blame Perot for 92 all you want. Blaming him for 96' doesn't make sense, Perot lost 11.7 million votes from his 92 totals. Repubs saw an increase of an astounding 92,919 votes. Perhaps Bob Dole was a bad Idea.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:34 PM
  #36  
scrambler400enoge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Shapeshifter Rider
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
From: Mishawaka,Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Scootergptx
Now I now how you got your nickname.
Meh

My shining moment to be a libertarian was when I got my first paycheck. It said 145.67$, below that it said Federal, state, and social security, the true amount that I was paid was like 105.34.


THAT is TYRANNY.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:39 PM
  #37  
scootergptx's Avatar
Supersock
Hired Gun!
"Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!"
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 142,526
Likes: 182
From: Land of the misfit toys
Default

Funny how before you earned anything thing, you were a die hard democrat.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:41 PM
  #38  
scrambler400enoge's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Shapeshifter Rider
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 0
From: Mishawaka,Indiana
Default

Originally Posted by Scootergptx
Funny how before you earned anything thing, you were a die hard democrat.
CHIT happens.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:47 PM
  #39  
beergut's Avatar
ʇsıʇɹɐ ɹǝʌolloɹ
Providing the enemies of the United States with the maximum opportunity to give their lives for their country since 1775.
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,284
Likes: 3
From: rindge, nh
Default

Meh

My shining moment to be a libertarian was when I got my first paycheck. It said 145.67$, below that it said Federal, state, and social security, the true amount that I was paid was like 105.34.


THAT is TYRANNY.
how much of your pay check would you consider "fair" to give to the gov't?
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:51 PM
  #40  
xFreebirdx's Avatar
Administrator¿
Resident Killer!
"A little nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men". Willy Wonka: 1971
Cigars! Earth ne'eer did breed such a jovial weed.
A Tiger Doesn't Lose Sleep Over Opinions of Sheep
20 Year Member
Veteran: Army
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 55,130
Likes: 5
From: Landrum, South Carolina, elevation 986'
Default

Originally Posted by scrambler400enoge
Meh

My shining moment to be a libertarian was when I got my first paycheck. It said 145.67$, below that it said Federal, state, and social security, the true amount that I was paid was like 105.34.


THAT is TYRANNY.

Instead of whining like a lil bitch because you had to start paying your way. You might should of took some of that money and bought a ******* clue.

You don't know **** about "tyranny".
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:23 PM.