new quad design for polaris
Dec 31, 2003 | 07:04 PM
#32
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
new quad design for polaris
So you are telling me that a two cylinder, lets say a 700 cc, is going to make MORE torque if only one piston is going and dragging the other "dead" piston along with it, and only having a 350cc displacement at the time. I think not.
Come on kids, ask daddy how an engine really works.
Come on kids, ask daddy how an engine really works.
Dec 31, 2003 | 07:09 PM
#33
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 0
new quad design for polaris
Originally posted by: Yellow650Rincon
So you are telling me that a two cylinder, lets say a 700 cc, is going to make MORE torque if only one piston is going and dragging the other "dead" piston along with it, and only having a 350cc displacement at the time. I think not.Come on kids, ask daddy how an engine really works.
So you are telling me that a two cylinder, lets say a 700 cc, is going to make MORE torque if only one piston is going and dragging the other "dead" piston along with it, and only having a 350cc displacement at the time. I think not.Come on kids, ask daddy how an engine really works.
Dec 31, 2003 | 10:02 PM
#35
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
new quad design for polaris
yall are right,im tired of this arguin about a bs idea that i had,i think we should squash it and have some funizzle for the new yizzle,its time for some one to be the bigger,better man,(wink)!!!
Jan 1, 2004 | 02:05 PM
#36
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,042
Likes: 1
new quad design for polaris
Originally posted by: Yellow650Rincon
So you are telling me that a two cylinder, lets say a 700 cc, is going to make MORE torque if only one piston is going and dragging the other "dead" piston along with it, and only having a 350cc displacement at the time. I think not.
Come on kids, ask daddy how an engine really works.
So you are telling me that a two cylinder, lets say a 700 cc, is going to make MORE torque if only one piston is going and dragging the other "dead" piston along with it, and only having a 350cc displacement at the time. I think not.
Come on kids, ask daddy how an engine really works.
Jan 1, 2004 | 07:49 PM
#39
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
new quad design for polaris
Since we are going into what we would LIKE to see, not necessarily what will wind up on the showroom floor, why not a big-bore 2 cycle, with a RIDER CONTROLLED power valve? It could be electronically controlled, and have 3 settings: Max torque, Max high RPM HP, and Auto. Really, the Max high RPM HP could be controlled by the computer in the auto mode, but for horsing around, it would be fun to have that high RPM 'hit', kind of like a Banshee does when on the pipe. It would be more for the IMPRESSION of power than actual power output.
You guys who ever rode a Banshee know what I mean, it starts off, kind of almost bogs, starts to rev up, and then WHAM! takes off like a rocket. Maybe not really any faster than a modded 400 Scrambler, but it FEELS faster, and is also FUN!
Just my 2 cents worth, and if the EPA would allow, could actually be done without a whole lot of difficulty.
Farmr
You guys who ever rode a Banshee know what I mean, it starts off, kind of almost bogs, starts to rev up, and then WHAM! takes off like a rocket. Maybe not really any faster than a modded 400 Scrambler, but it FEELS faster, and is also FUN!
Just my 2 cents worth, and if the EPA would allow, could actually be done without a whole lot of difficulty.
Farmr