<< I guess some people cant keep it to themselves that they dont like 600+ pound automatic sport quadsą ..hehe >>





<< Sport Quads refering to utility atv's with sport fenders in this case. >>



TitanRacing25,

Any time you want to see what one of these 600 lb. automatic sport quads ( mine weighs 420 lbs dry) can do to your Craptor, Y'all can come up here to Pennsylvania. I'll learn ya reeeel good. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

 

The SHO may have had more HP then the 302 Mustang, but it didn't have as much torgue. The difference between &quot;faster&quot; and &quot;quicker&quot;. Personally, I get more of a rush from acceleration then from &quot;pedal to the metal&quot; top speed. To me it isn't as important how fast you can go, as it is, how quickly can you get there! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

Rick

PS. It doesn't matter to me what anyone rides as long as they say &quot;yes&quot; when I ask them to go riding, and they enjoy it as much as I do! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

Well I guess I also should have thrown in that it could also &quot;womp&quot; the Mustang GT's of various years (80's through early 90's) in the 1/4 mile as well. I know a 1994 GT 5.0 for sure from experience. Unfortunatly the new Stangs (much like the classic ones) are out of it's league [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-sad.gif[/img] . That's okay though. Take care.

-Josh

 

Titan maybe i didnt word it good enough. I meant argue with people about and trying to change their mind about polaris. Now i dont mind a good conversation with someone on why one bike is better but this stupid stuff is a waste of mine time understand now.

 

Josh,
You may be right about the 1/4 numbers. I don't know right off what they were for the HO 302, and the SHO taurus. However, I have ridden in both, and the 'Stang definately had more &quot;eyeball flattening&quot; acceleration off the line or in a low rpm roll on then the SHO. Once you got the SHO wound up though, it had some real authority!

Rick

 

Yup Rick you are right. The SHO doesn't build much power until about 3k RPM's. The Mustang with the big V8 has it throughout the RMP range. The Stang is also rear wheel drive which is nice. It's hard to get the SHO to hook up under power.

-Josh

 

if you think that mustang is eyeball flattening,
try the SS 454

 

I own a 94 Yamaha V-max. I completely understand &quot;eyeball flattening&quot; acceleration. I would also like to add that in a drag race I would smoke a SS454. Its fast for a car, but easy picken's for a bike![img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

Rick

 

bikes are fast

 

good god I was just messin around, calm down, btw im not going to waste my gas to go race someone in another state that far away, are you crazy? I mean i understand people trying to defend themselves, but why do you ahve to act all big and bad about it, I mean I dont even have my license im 15, so WHY DONT YOU DRIVE DOWN HERE AND &quot;show me how it's done&quot;.