Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

LTZ400 vs LT250R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-19-2003, 03:41 PM
RaptorOwner's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

BESTz400ryder that is correct also. My brother has a lt250r and is selling it to buy a z400 so he can keep up.
 
  #12  
Old 07-19-2003, 05:30 PM
TomM's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

LTZ400 faster than LT250R [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]

Maybe stock for stock against an 85-86 model with no power valve.

Anyone on a LTZ400 who thinks he's going to beat any LT250R aside from a stock 85-86 model (maybe) should have seen my 97 Dodge Ram smoke a brand new F150 Lightning the other day.

Normally I don’t argue about what quad is faster but this one is a no brainer.



 
  #13  
Old 07-19-2003, 05:37 PM
RaptorOwner's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

Yes they are stock for stock bikes and the z400 blows it away by 4 to 5 bike lengths at the drag strip in pismo. Now that I got a pipe its even faster.
 
  #14  
Old 07-19-2003, 06:23 PM
chuck1221's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

The lt's are a lot faster and easier to ride. The z400 is a cadillac. I just sold my lt for a z not more than a month ago. there is a big power differance.

chuck
 
  #15  
Old 07-19-2003, 06:42 PM
roosthrower's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

dude you z400 riders are trippin.
the lt250 makes 32hp and it weighs like 330lbs dry.
the z400 makes like 30hp and it weighs like 370 lbs dry.
the lt is a 6 speed too.
z400 owners yall might have beaten lt's that needed a top end but a good running lt would beat a z in a drag stock for stock.
 
  #16  
Old 07-19-2003, 06:43 PM
Slacker1bob's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

Stock for stock, the Z400 would possibly get off the line first, but the top end of the two stroke may overcome in the end. Dont know, never seen two stock bocks go at each other. I do know that last presidents day, there were about 3 or 4 Z400s of various mod stages, and I beat them all with my 86(No powervalve). Granted, my quad has a stage 1 port, wiseco piston, FMF pipe, and a K&N filter(among ther things), but I have less than $2000 invested in my bike, including what I paid for it. Z400 starts at around $4000. So for the budget minded, it is easier to go with the LT250
Now, I would love to own a Z400, because I am sure the ride is great and plush, but unless you have a lot of money to spend, it is easier to modify the 2 stroke and get more power.
 
  #17  
Old 07-19-2003, 06:53 PM
RaptorOwner's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

Well there you said it, Lt250r may need top end work. Well the Z400 is low maintenance to compared to the 2 strokers. I have seen moded out lt250r's but then again I also have seen a ltz400 moded out slightly by Sparks Racing and that thing beats Moded Raptors and some honda 250r's as well. So the Z400 has alot of potential if you want to mod it out as well. Sparks racing is also building my buddies Z400 to a 486 and it will be tremendously fast.

Are you sure your not talking about a lt500??
 
  #18  
Old 07-19-2003, 07:46 PM
Slacker1bob's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

Pretty, sure I am not talking about a LT500. I have owned my quad for 11 years and I just did a topend rebuid 2 years ago. My quad has been very reliable I am sure that the porting wasn't the deciding factor in me beating the Z400. Either way, the pipe on the Z400 was probably $300, while the porting, my FMF pipe and the K&N air filter cost me less than $300. I got my port work done For only $80, so it isnt a typical case. Still you see my point.
 
  #19  
Old 07-19-2003, 07:55 PM
ShadyRascal's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,487
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R

My opinion is that since almost nobody leaves these things stock, the fair comparison would be with breathing mods only---pipe and airbox & jetting. In that scenario, I think the Z400 would come out on top. Of course it's easy to do a port job on an LT and for a grand worth of engine work you have a pretty good running unit. My LT has 39PWK carb, reeds, half-*** pipe, 170psi compression, .080 over, and a guy with a 436 Z with cams, pipe and no porting made me look like a lawn tractor.
 
  #20  
Old 07-19-2003, 08:07 PM
RaptorOwner's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 3,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTZ400 vs LT250R


Slacker1bob you get ShadyRascal's point? Enough said, you must not have been around any moded Z's yet, but when one goes by you, I can bet you will say "WTF was that?"
 


Quick Reply: LTZ400 vs LT250R



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.