Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

Ball Joints

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 2, 2009 | 09:22 PM
  #1  
lt230sman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default Ball Joints

So I was thinking about ball joints, and I've come to the conclusion that I DONT LIKE THEM.

The thought of how much stress the lower ball joint is subjected to (in the direction of pulling the ball out, with no secondary retention system) in a jump or even just everyday riding is mindboggling. Sure, it works, and "you shouldnt fix it if it aint broke", but I'm still not satisfied. And, I've had plenty of ball joints let go, and we all know that's not fun.

The thing that really opposes me to them is something that happened to my 230 a few months back....

Pre-ride I performed my usual inspection, and the ball joints checked out PERFECT.

The whole day, we were hitting big jumps, and even had a few front heavy landings, no problem.

Then, towards the end of the day, my friend is turning around slowly in first gear, when the left lower ball joint lets go, WTF???

That un-predictability factor may be a fluke, but I sure as hell dont like it.

So, I think I've found the solution, the Laegers Pro-Trax Front End.

It's pure genious. The ball is loaded in a much stronger way, i.e. the ball is just being seated harder with the force applied, as opposed to being yanked out.

No, I'm not buying a $2000 front end for a 23 year old 230.

However, it doesnt look that hard to duplicate. The spindles already have holes in the right places, plus heims and clevises are cheap from mcmaster-carr.

Now, for my application, I think I would switch the locations of the heims and clevises, because the hole in the spindle for the lower ball joint is half-blind (I have no place to put a nut). I would then just weld the clevises in permanently and weld shut the pinch clearance slots.

And best of all, even if a ball came un-seated, there is a secondary retention system, the bolt itself! Thats the main reason why I'm not really too concerned about my a-arm bearings.

So, whats everyones thoughts?
 
Attached Thumbnails Ball Joints-laeger-protrax.jpg  

Last edited by lt230sman; Apr 2, 2009 at 09:24 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 04:12 AM
  #2  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

I thought you used hiems when you made new a-arms?
 
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 04:12 AM
  #3  
JustRandy's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 5,227
Likes: 0
Default

I thought you used hiems when you made new a-arms?
 
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #4  
lt230sman's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,111
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

well, thats going to be for the end that actually mounts to the frame.

i was thinking about the end by the spindles, and what i could do to improve that.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STLyamwar
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
1
Jul 25, 2020 04:44 AM
89Lt250r
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
1
Sep 7, 2015 07:53 PM
toonces
Buying an ATV
2
Aug 13, 2015 12:40 PM
toonces
Yamaha
1
Aug 12, 2015 06:42 AM
musselmark
Chinese Quads
6
Jul 17, 2015 02:40 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 AM.