Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

Can't believe the whining about the Quad Sport 400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-10-2001, 11:09 PM
RobS's Avatar
Trailblazer
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I to am glad to see another choice in the sport market. I was hoping the new Zuk would have reverse (which it does). It is just what I was looking for, a 400ex with reverse. I think they will sell a ton of these new quads, barring any unforseen flaws. I am anxious for them to be available, wonder what the price will be? As for you two stroke fans, face it, it isnt going to happen. Be glad ANY sport quad is on the market!
 
  #12  
Old 10-13-2001, 12:31 AM
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

juggalo, the banshee owners that put eyes on their headlights are savage crack fiends. If I buy that quad, which I won't (Cannondale is ten times better) I would get some fullbore plastic or take the eyes out. EYES! WTF!
 
  #13  
Old 10-13-2001, 03:05 AM
Slinger's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

and ten times uglier. Check out the froggy eyeballs on those things.
 
  #14  
Old 10-13-2001, 12:15 PM
imported_juggalo's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what!? you complain about the suzuki having eyes but you like cannondales!? THEY HAVE HEADLIGHTS THAT LOOK MOST LIKE EYES THAN ANY OTHER QUAD! LOOK AT EM! it looks like a damn frog!!!
 
  #15  
Old 10-13-2001, 01:34 PM
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't remember saying I like cannondale that much that you keep reminding me I do. As for cannondale, they're even uglier, but they got the technology to kill a god damn ugly *** raptor.
 
  #16  
Old 10-13-2001, 01:50 PM
660R01's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And I suppose a 1986 Suzuki Quadracer is a beauty queen?
 
  #17  
Old 10-14-2001, 02:55 AM
Slinger's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good one 660
 
  #18  
Old 10-14-2001, 01:04 PM
SaMs0n's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't believe people would whine about a quad they haven't seen up close or ridden yet.
 
  #19  
Old 10-14-2001, 01:48 PM
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ARG! I take it all back! i love the new quad minus the damn eyes. I think they'll get some more critisism about them. It's a GREAT looking quad minus the pupils, and they're not a big deal at all. Cannondale are the ugliest thing on the dirt but they've got EFI and an aluminum frame. I wasn't expecting too much from suzuki, but when I see one beat a cannibal it will have my full respect. I can really live with the eyes. I don't want to talk about it anymore, and frankly, I'm starting to sound like a dumbass. I said cannondale was ten times better and then I said "I don't remember saying I like cannondale that much that you keep reminding me I do. As for cannondale, they're even uglier, but they got the technology to kill a god damn ugly *** raptor." as for 660R01's comment, The quad looks great with some modifications. Just wait and see what I have planned for my machine... mwahahahaha!
 
  #20  
Old 10-14-2001, 02:07 PM
mudmanatv4x4's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

everybody shut up about this whole, which quad looks better, and the eye thing. i think every quad looks good and i dont really give a f if a fast quad looks ugly. i rather have a fast quad that looks ugly then a slow that looks amazing. now please stop argueing about these EYES maybe its in your head.
 


Quick Reply: Can't believe the whining about the Quad Sport 400



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:40 PM.