2006 Rincon 700 EFI vs 2006 King Quad 700 EFI
#21
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Toyeboy, I beleive you are correct on the locker issue. I am not sure how the traxlock system works. The brakes issue has been solved with tripple disc brakes instead of tripple drumb brakes on the new Rincons. From past experince 20cc is not always a guaranty that one engine will be more powerfull than another. Look at the Honda and Yamaha 450's and how they both put out more power than the Raptor 660's. I also have a P650 that is well tuned and puts out 1 hp more than a stock P700 on back to back dyno runs. There is alsmost 70cc difference there. Not saying the Honda is going to be more powerfull than a KQ, and going by there past products perfomace traits, I too doubt it will be. I will however be surprised if it is not at least close in power.
I tend to like to break things down to advantages and dissadvantages
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power = advantage KQ ???
Handaling = Slight advantage Rincon
Reliabilty = Advantage Rincon
EFI = a Tie
Trans reliability = Advantage Rincon
Traction ability = Advantade KQ
Engine Braking ability = Advantage KQ
Looks = Tie
Seat comfort = Tie
overall Ergo's = slight Advantage Rincon
Work ability = advantage Rincon (No Belts)
Stability = advantage Rincon
Ground clearance = Advantage KQ
Color choices = advantage KQ
Gage cluster = Aadvantage Rincon (available GPS)
Price = Advantage KQ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
For me those are my most important issues and the score for me is 7 to 6 In favor of the Honda.
I tend to like to break things down to advantages and dissadvantages
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Power = advantage KQ ???
Handaling = Slight advantage Rincon
Reliabilty = Advantage Rincon
EFI = a Tie
Trans reliability = Advantage Rincon
Traction ability = Advantade KQ
Engine Braking ability = Advantage KQ
Looks = Tie
Seat comfort = Tie
overall Ergo's = slight Advantage Rincon
Work ability = advantage Rincon (No Belts)
Stability = advantage Rincon
Ground clearance = Advantage KQ
Color choices = advantage KQ
Gage cluster = Aadvantage Rincon (available GPS)
Price = Advantage KQ
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
For me those are my most important issues and the score for me is 7 to 6 In favor of the Honda.
#22
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by: cc1999
Maybe so, but it is there top sport model then and now, and is not head of its class as you were indicating. I do remember it being compared to the Raptor and the 400ex when it came out since those three were the top models from the big 3 mfg's. It may have been the top 400 cc sport, but there were only 2 the suki and the honda back then that were making 400cc sports I think thats still the case now.The AC and the Kawi's are just cloans of the Z400. It was not head of the sport class in power. Which was what I was talking about a few post back when I said the KQ was somewhat mid pack in the power department. Meaning again that it cannot run with the big twins of other mfg's in the performance department. If Suki wants to be head of the UTE power game they need to swich motors to at least a well tuned EFI 750+ twin or to be safe 800+ twin. I am thinking you are trying to tell me the KQ is not mid pack in the Power department, if its not what would you rather me call it. I know of at least 4 Big Bore machines on the market today that will outrun it. There are only about 9 big bores on the market that I can think of at the moment, and knowing from experince that it resides at about #5 in power I refeered to it as mid pack, I was doing my best to still be honset and try not to offend KQ owners with my thoughts on the matter.
Maybe so, but it is there top sport model then and now, and is not head of its class as you were indicating. I do remember it being compared to the Raptor and the 400ex when it came out since those three were the top models from the big 3 mfg's. It may have been the top 400 cc sport, but there were only 2 the suki and the honda back then that were making 400cc sports I think thats still the case now.The AC and the Kawi's are just cloans of the Z400. It was not head of the sport class in power. Which was what I was talking about a few post back when I said the KQ was somewhat mid pack in the power department. Meaning again that it cannot run with the big twins of other mfg's in the performance department. If Suki wants to be head of the UTE power game they need to swich motors to at least a well tuned EFI 750+ twin or to be safe 800+ twin. I am thinking you are trying to tell me the KQ is not mid pack in the Power department, if its not what would you rather me call it. I know of at least 4 Big Bore machines on the market today that will outrun it. There are only about 9 big bores on the market that I can think of at the moment, and knowing from experince that it resides at about #5 in power I refeered to it as mid pack, I was doing my best to still be honset and try not to offend KQ owners with my thoughts on the matter.
#23
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by: Toyeboy
It just susprised me earlier when you said that the KQ didn't seem peppy for a 700, compare it to the Sportsman 700 EFI twin and the Grizzly 660, the KQ has more speed and power than them, so I don't know why you thought it wasn't peppy, maybe the low end lag gave you a bad impression of it, because after 0-5mph it's power pulls hard and it's powerband stays strong. Also someone on a different forum told me he had a BF 750 and his friend had a KQ, he said the BF 750 felt faster but when they drag race they were even, and they switched quad and the results were the same, so that says a lot about the KQ's 695cc single IMO. Does the new Rincon have diff lock? Does it have a better tranny setup (a low gear)? What about disk brakes instead of drums? If my sources are correct it doesn't have any of this, and everything else in this class has it including the KQ, so I don't think it is better, plus it's only 675cc.
It just susprised me earlier when you said that the KQ didn't seem peppy for a 700, compare it to the Sportsman 700 EFI twin and the Grizzly 660, the KQ has more speed and power than them, so I don't know why you thought it wasn't peppy, maybe the low end lag gave you a bad impression of it, because after 0-5mph it's power pulls hard and it's powerband stays strong. Also someone on a different forum told me he had a BF 750 and his friend had a KQ, he said the BF 750 felt faster but when they drag race they were even, and they switched quad and the results were the same, so that says a lot about the KQ's 695cc single IMO. Does the new Rincon have diff lock? Does it have a better tranny setup (a low gear)? What about disk brakes instead of drums? If my sources are correct it doesn't have any of this, and everything else in this class has it including the KQ, so I don't think it is better, plus it's only 675cc.
#24
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thanks crblick, I knew it had some kind of traction system on it. I just did not know how the traxlock worked. Good info.
goblin, if you want to pin it down to a class why throw in the 350's the warrior is an entry level sport quad that was almost an antic when the Z400 came out. Lets just use 400cc only as a class and the Z400 is the winner. I could argue that the Z400 has been racing in the field with the Yami 450 and Honda 450's on the track both of wich will out perform the Raptor 660 in everthing but backing up. So in the 400 class the Z400 beats the only other 400 out there the Honda 400ex a machine that came out in 1998, I would expect the Z400 to beat it since it hit the market 4 or 5 years later. If Suki had wanted to realy up the anty they would have used one of there race dirt bikes motors in stead of the trail / enduro 400, like they are working on now. My point is still that Honda and Suki tend to be more mid pack followers rather than rule bending inovators in the market. That is not ment as a slam on honda or Suki just an avid fan of all things atv oppsevation.
goblin, if you want to pin it down to a class why throw in the 350's the warrior is an entry level sport quad that was almost an antic when the Z400 came out. Lets just use 400cc only as a class and the Z400 is the winner. I could argue that the Z400 has been racing in the field with the Yami 450 and Honda 450's on the track both of wich will out perform the Raptor 660 in everthing but backing up. So in the 400 class the Z400 beats the only other 400 out there the Honda 400ex a machine that came out in 1998, I would expect the Z400 to beat it since it hit the market 4 or 5 years later. If Suki had wanted to realy up the anty they would have used one of there race dirt bikes motors in stead of the trail / enduro 400, like they are working on now. My point is still that Honda and Suki tend to be more mid pack followers rather than rule bending inovators in the market. That is not ment as a slam on honda or Suki just an avid fan of all things atv oppsevation.
#25
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]It appears with a lot of the mfgrs upping their motors to 700, 750, and 800 to me
I would think that was enough. An individual at the atv pull here in Maine to me that
Yamma was coming out with and 880, and was disappointed when it never showed
up this year. If this keeps up the atvs will use as much gas as my pickup.
I would think that was enough. An individual at the atv pull here in Maine to me that
Yamma was coming out with and 880, and was disappointed when it never showed
up this year. If this keeps up the atvs will use as much gas as my pickup.
#27
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Back to this trax-loc thing from honda, correct me if im wrong but I thought that it was a device that allows it to switch from 2 to 4 wheel drive via some magnetic mechanism. That was one of the things that sold a foreman 450 to my dad was the ability to switch back and forth but I could be wrong.
#28
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by: cc1999
Thanks crblick, I knew it had some kind of traction system on it. I just did not know how the traxlock worked. Good info.
goblin, if you want to pin it down to a class why throw in the 350's the warrior is an entry level sport quad that was almost an antic when the Z400 came out. Lets just use 400cc only as a class and the Z400 is the winner. I could argue that the Z400 has been racing in the field with the Yami 450 and Honda 450's on the track both of wich will out perform the Raptor 660 in everthing but backing up. So in the 400 class the Z400 beats the only other 400 out there the Honda 400ex a machine that came out in 1998, I would expect the Z400 to beat it since it hit the market 4 or 5 years later. If Suki had wanted to realy up the anty they would have used one of there race dirt bikes motors in stead of the trail / enduro 400, like they are working on now. My point is still that Honda and Suki tend to be more mid pack followers rather than rule bending inovators in the market. That is not ment as a slam on honda or Suki just an avid fan of all things atv oppsevation.
Thanks crblick, I knew it had some kind of traction system on it. I just did not know how the traxlock worked. Good info.
goblin, if you want to pin it down to a class why throw in the 350's the warrior is an entry level sport quad that was almost an antic when the Z400 came out. Lets just use 400cc only as a class and the Z400 is the winner. I could argue that the Z400 has been racing in the field with the Yami 450 and Honda 450's on the track both of wich will out perform the Raptor 660 in everthing but backing up. So in the 400 class the Z400 beats the only other 400 out there the Honda 400ex a machine that came out in 1998, I would expect the Z400 to beat it since it hit the market 4 or 5 years later. If Suki had wanted to realy up the anty they would have used one of there race dirt bikes motors in stead of the trail / enduro 400, like they are working on now. My point is still that Honda and Suki tend to be more mid pack followers rather than rule bending inovators in the market. That is not ment as a slam on honda or Suki just an avid fan of all things atv oppsevation.
#29
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally posted by: sweet650
Back to this trax-loc thing from honda, correct me if im wrong but I thought that it was a device that allows it to switch from 2 to 4 wheel drive via some magnetic mechanism. That was one of the things that sold a foreman 450 to my dad was the ability to switch back and forth but I could be wrong.
Back to this trax-loc thing from honda, correct me if im wrong but I thought that it was a device that allows it to switch from 2 to 4 wheel drive via some magnetic mechanism. That was one of the things that sold a foreman 450 to my dad was the ability to switch back and forth but I could be wrong.
#30
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 350 Raptor or Warrior that was out when the Z400 hit the market was a 10 year old quad with a utility quad motor. They were not fast at all, they had horrable ergo's and very old tech suspension and is 50cc light.If you wont put the 450's in with the Z400 then you cant put the entry level 300-350 class in with it either. I cant think of any magazine shootouts putting them together. The new Raptor 350 does have an improved suspesion but still is more in the 300ex's class not the 400ex or Z400 class. The difference in performance of a raptor 350 / warrior to the 400ex is like the Raptor to the 400 ex. Years ago I had a warrior when my brother had his 300ex trust me those two are, and belong in the entry level sport class, They run out very close with the Honda having the edge in handeling.