Where to Ride Share info on your favorite riding spot or ask others where to ride.

Minnesota riders?

Old Apr 21, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #121  
minnrider's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Default Minnesota riders?

You might be on to a good idea there Dave.a new club,maybe the Northfield Sand Riders Association.it appears to me that there is enough interest in the place to have a huge number of members.several local people to make up president vice president and secretary would be ideal.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 06:04 PM
  #122  
klier's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Faribault, MN
Default Minnesota riders?

I don't have the info with me (I'm at work), but there is a law that protects property owners who allow people on their land for recreational purposes. So liability is not an issue. So long as Roy does not collect any type of payment whether it's a 6-pack of Bud, a Penthouse, cash donations, and the list goes on.
Hey Dave, could you point me to that document or E-Mail it over to me? I'd like to have a copy on hand since it may ease my parents' worries about riding out at their place.
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #123  
MNRAP's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 754
Likes: 0
Default Minnesota riders?

not to change the subject,, but does anyone want to ride May 1 st ? Clark county WS

LOOK HERE
 
Reply
Old Apr 21, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #124  
klier's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
From: Faribault, MN
Default Minnesota riders?

If someone gets hurt you take on the liability. Of coarse typically your homeowner’s policy will cover this type of accident up to a fixed amount.
Thanks to LEP7MM, who pointed out this statute. This is a pretty important statute that everyone should know about. ATV-relevant parts are highlighted. Or, look at this link directly from the horse's mouth.

Minnesota Statutes 604A.20: Policy

It is the policy of this state, in furtherance of the
public health and welfare, to encourage and promote the use of
land owned by a municipal power agency and privately owned lands
and waters by the public for beneficial recreational purposes,
and the provisions of sections 604A.20 to 604A.27 are enacted to
that end.


604A.21 Recreational land use; definitions.

Subdivision 1. General. For the purposes of sections
604A.20 to 604A.27, the terms defined in this section have the
meanings given them, except where the context clearly indicates
otherwise.

Subd. 2. Charge. "Charge" means any admission price
asked or charged for services, entertainment, recreational use,
or other activity or the offering of products for sale to the
recreational user by a commercial for profit enterprise directly
related to the use of the land.

Subd. 2a. Dedicated. "Dedicated" means made
available by easement, license, permit, or other authorization.

Subd. 3. Land. "Land" means any of the following
which is privately owned or leased or in which a municipal power
agency has rights: land, easements, rights-of-way, roads,
water, watercourses, private ways and buildings, structures, and
other improvements to land, and machinery or equipment when
attached to land.

Subd. 4. Owner. "Owner" means the possessor of a fee
interest or a life estate, tenant, lessee, occupant, holder of a
utility easement, or person in control of the land.

Subd. 5. Recreational purpose. "Recreational purpose"
includes, but is not limited to, hunting; trapping; fishing;
swimming; boating; camping; picnicking; hiking; bicycling;
horseback riding; firewood gathering; pleasure driving,
including snowmobiling and the operation of any motorized
vehicle or conveyance upon a road or upon or across land in any
manner, including recreational trail use
; nature study; water
skiing; winter sports; and viewing or enjoying historical,
archaeological, scenic, or scientific sites.

Subd. 6. Recreational trail use. "Recreational trail
use" means use on or about a trail, including but not limited
to, hunting, trapping, fishing, hiking, bicycling, skiing,
horseback riding, snowmobile riding, and motorized trail riding.


604A.22 Owner's duty of care or duty to give warnings.

Except as provided in section 604A.25, an owner who gives
written or oral permission for the use of the land for
recreational purposes without charge:

(1) owes no duty of care to render or maintain the land
safe for entry or use by other persons for recreational purpose;

(2) owes no duty to warn those persons of any dangerous
condition on the land, whether patent or latent;

(3) owes no duty of care toward those persons except to
refrain from willfully taking action to cause injury; and

(4) owes no duty to curtail use of the land during its use
for recreational purpose.


604A.23 Owner's liability.

An owner who gives written or oral permission for the use
of the land for recreational purposes without charge does not by
that action:


(1) extend any assurance that the land is safe for any
purpose;

(2) confer upon the person the legal status of an invitee
or licensee to whom a duty of care is owed; or

(3) assume responsibility for or incur liability for any
injury to the person or property caused by an act or omission of
the person.


There you go, guys. I'm not a lawyer, and I don't accept liability for the interpretation of this statute (ha ha), but you should be less afraid to let people ride on your own land now!
 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #125  
ATC83's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Default Minnesota riders?

Originally posted by: LEP7MM
ATC83,

your question brings up a double edge sword.

First, if people continue to ride, it could very possibly hurt our chances of it ever becoming a GIA due to the Commissioner's perception of the off-roaders. By this, I mean all off-roaders. We get pooled into one group, good or bad. However, if we look at the positive side of this, it shows a massive demand for the need of this pit to be open to the public.

In the post when I quoted the rough cost at $250K, that includes everything from the landscaping, materials (fencing, posts, gates), bathroom facilities (rental fees if portable), heavy equipment costs, manual labor, disposal fees for garbage, and the lease for the property just to name a few items we would be looking at.

After thinking some of this through, What if we just did a lease through the Bauer family through a club, such as mine (it doesn't have to go this way), everybody who rides becomes a member, and we possibly avoid the legal BS that we have seen. It might be worth looking into.


Your thoughts?


LEP7MM,
Thanks for posting the state statute. It really clears a lot of issues up. I think your idea about leasing the land from Roy is really good. It sounds like what you are proposing is similar to what the South Central Dirt Riders did with the SMC gravel pit. I have two questions; first, would you need to get a conditional use permit from the county in order to operate the riding area. I would think you wouldn't have to because the riding area is run as a non-profit. I believe when you lease property the individual leasing the land retains the same rights as the landowner does. My second question, which I think you have already answered by your last post, is would the club have to purchase liability insurance? Obviously a plan like this would have a lot of obstacles to overcome, the major one being if Roy would be willing to lease the land. I would think he would, because as it stands right now he is not making any money from ATV use in his pit and the prospects seem very slim that he is going to be able to open up his pit as a GIA riding area.

 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 10:14 AM
  #126  
LEP7MM's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Default Minnesota riders?

ATC83,

as for insurance, it would be required for a clubs members to ride if the club did lease the pit from Roy.

The lessee does have the same rights as the owner as far as land use. We would just need to insure ourselves as a club. That runs approximately $1000/year. For an example, let's say my club charges $30/year for a membership. We would need 304 members to cover the cost of just the insurance.

But now lets look at it this way. Let's say that Roy starts his own club. He draws funds into the club for riding in the pit, uses the funds to cover the insurance, and in turn, pays himself a lease, from the club, for the property. This may be going out on a limb, but I certainly wouldn't rule it out. He can set his own lease rate. He can set his own by-laws, such as members pay membership dues based on visits to the pit.

We might have to pursue this route.

Thanks for any other ideas.


Dave


 
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2005 | 12:09 PM
  #127  
ZButcheR's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Default Minnesota riders?

Originally posted by: MNRAP
not to change the subject,, but does anyone want to ride May 1 st ? Clark county WS

LOOK HERE
I'll go the 1st, shoot me a mail will set it up....
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Customer Service #1
Arctic Cat
73
May 15, 2020 08:46 AM
ATVC Correspondent
Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:37 AM
black_thunder
ATV Videos
2
Sep 20, 2015 10:21 PM
Elkaholic
Land, Trail and Environmental Issues
1
Sep 6, 2015 02:44 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:17 AM.