yamaha owners bias? never...






























LOL!

 

I wonder why.. I took a little time looking at your sig... LOL

 

that is very true, maybe i am a little bias but only towards warriors. people talk bad about them always and ive made it my offroad mission to prove them wrong. i have spent about 5500 total and am able to beat z400's and raptor's plus some banshees and 250'rs which it is quite easy to spend 6 or 7 k and have an unreliable gas guzzling, although fast but not nearly as overall good as warriors.... not the best but pretty damn good

 

you obviously got your warrior used then... right?

 

Never say never, tehcnically, with the price difference the warrior could be made faster than the Z400 but then it wouldnt be all that reliable. Only some people in here are biased, mostly people that own... oh. never mind I wont say any names *coughraptorcough*

 

the price isnt that much differnt between a warrior and a z... is it... z is like 5600 and a warrior is like what.. 5400?

 

i think the warrior is 4800 rite?

 

DAM... the dealer up here is makin some cash of them then!

 

i get a kick out of how people think that top speed is everything to do with everything.. in a straight line the z would smoke the warrior.. and on a curvy or bumpy trail it would really smoke it .. the warrior is a tank.. Anyway you look at it. Heavy and the suspension sucks.. it would cost alot of money to get a warrior up to far with a z400.. by that time would be better off just givin up and gettin a z.. i have a warrior myself but im gettin a z.. thought about the ltz450 but i do more trail ridding then anything.. I work at a marina , we are a suzuki dealer and i can get my z at dealer cost.. otherwise i would pry spring for a yfz450 or a trx450..

 

mmmm... I can't wait till i trade my craptor for a ltr, I was thinking about the Z but i thought i would get tired of the power. Only pros can drive ltr's in tight trails. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]