the Blaster by far over a 250 ex.

 

The Blaster would smoke it.

 

Here we go, Honda fans battling yama fans. before i go on, keep this in mind...i am not bias to any one company, they all are good in their own ways. but hands down a stock blaster will spank a 300ex no matter who is riding. i own an 03 blaster, 100% bone factory stock. and i have ridden a friends 300ex back when it was brand new. i thought there was something wrong with it because it was slow, but it turns out my blaster is just faster. the EX isnt bad at all, i think its a good quad in its own right, but it cnt hang with blasters. and to this day i still havent been beaten by any EX. no mods iether. im not saying blaster are the best, but they will beat a 300ex, and for the 250ex, LMAO, i have no comment.

 

my slightly moded blsater will eat a 300 ex.

 

i would never waste my money on a 300ex or 250ex there just 2 damn slow iv dragged both and i had to spot lights to both of them i even beat my cousin who was a tricked out schee beyond beleif (he red lighted) but i got to the last race and i got beat by a raptor (i ran out of my time) otherwise i had him cuz i had a .530 reaction (my best) and it was first time drag racing beginners luck or just 2 damn good to be true ill choose the second one.... bone stock at the time

 

Some people like to overate Blasters. They can be modded to be pretty fast but like the Banshee they are not really that quick stock, people just think so because they see so many modded Banshees/Blasters and so few stock ones.

My first ATV was a ragged out 86 Quadsport LT230. My friends stock Blaster would slowly pull away from me, I could keep up in the dirt until I hit top end if I got a real good holeshot. 300EXs would beat me pretty solid, 400EXs didn’t even have to open it up to beat me. Never raced a 250EX.

The only time I would not feel comfortable betting on a 300EX against a stock Blaster would be on pavement if the Blaster rider was a lot smaller and I still wouldn’t bet on the Blaster.

 

How is that not biased? You own a Blaster! My 300ex with just a pipe beat my friends piped blaster and he is a better rider than me....

 

Laughing too hard, can't type!

 

I agree thats a load of BS there buddy, a blaster would be left by a stock SHEE in the first few gears, and a 300ex being too damn slow? well i have a rude awakening for you, a 300ex stock once broken in good is only about 2/3 mph slower than a blaster, please dont post bs or stuff you dont know.

 

I agree with Raptor8tor and the others. Do a search on this (type in "blaster" and "300ex") and I'm sure you'll get plenty of results. But to answer your question...

200 2-stroke vs. 300 4-stroke. The Blaster is a light bike, and it revs pretty fast. We still have a Honda 250X that's stock, and I remember back in the day when I had my Blaster, it felt like it had more power. The 300 might have an edge, but put a Toomey on the blaster, and it's over.