um i think honda just shouild of stuck with street bikes and cars i really dont think there quades are that relieable i mean some are fast yeah but there not relieable in my opinion not trying to start a fight just tell me what u think

 

I agree with the Beechman....

 

you mean DaBeechman

 

No way. Hondas can be beaten like nothing else. My friend beats the pi$$ out of his TRX300, its a 2000 and he has only replaced the tires on it. Even original brakes lol. Hondas can definitely take a beating.

 

that is the most ignorant sentence (if you want to call it that) I have ever read.

Saying a honda quad is not reliable is like saying you have good grammar.

 

I didnt know a company could suck just because they make similar yet BETTER machines. If they are better, how do they suck. Think a little next time. Well they arent really better, just have some better specs, and some worse as well.

 

SUZUKI WAS THE FIRST ON 4 WHEELS...DOES THAT MEAN HONDA AND YAMAHA COPIED THEM ???????
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]

 

if you compared the 86 250r to the 85 LT you'll know that honda didnt copy anything...lol. Only thing that was good about the LT250 was that the chassis was lighter and thus a trx250 motor in a lt chassis served to be a potent combination in the 80's for flat track.

LOL at the newb that says honda's arent reliable. Go ride your blaster little boy

 

Itallion Stallion, lay off the freaking caps lock.

Suzuki dominated for one year, 85. They were faster than most of the three wheelers of the time because of the frame geometry and of course 4 wheels. The honda came out and blew them away and the sport quad era began, at least for a few years.

Yamaha and honda dont have to upgrade every damn year. It costs a lot of money to upgrade a machine. You have tooling to change, assembly lines to alter, etc. The banshee, blaster and warrior were out for almost 15 years with only one major design change each. The 400ex and raptor are still selling a lot of units and the start up costs are already dealt with. Why spend more money when they dont have to? They each have their flagship 450 in the spotlight, so any changes to thier other machines makes less of an impact on buyers anyway.

Suzuki didnt do a whole heck of a lot of copying either. Yes the dimensions of the frames are just about the same, but you have a competely different engine with dohc and liquid cooling. The plastic and healight design is based on other suzuki machines, and it even has a little of a t-shaped seat. It is the same size engine, but suzuki was only borrowing from an existing machine anyway. Had they had a bike with a different engine that would fit in the frame, they might have used it. Its still a better quad in many ways than the 400ex and its a great seller. Quit whining and go ride.

 

why do Zilla's suck, was it too fast for you??[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]