Opinion is fine, I think we established that at an earlier time.

The pipe on your sister's and your mom's bikes, (I saw the pics on that "other" site), are both the old style and have not been sold in over a year and possibly longer. So your observations and expereiences do not necessarily apply, at least not in the same significance that they could have with the second generation ct pipe.

This explains some of our discrepancies, but I am sure it will not quell all of your discontent with the company, which is perfectly understandable.

 

HMF makes a good system. So doesn't Sparks and Alba.

 

thanks maddog[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

I bought the CT at that time because I thought it was the BEST pipe. I and my bike have changed in the last three years[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] for the best... CT is a good company, and have been relatively happy, and I may be comparing apples to oranges between the old and new ct, I appologize. I've been trying and trying to get ahold of ct to see what I can do with that Headpipe!!! i don't want it to taper with a 686 engine in it... I am trying to get in tough with Alan at ct, I keep talking to a kid that is clueless on what I am trying to get done... oh well either i get a larger headpipe from ct or sell it and go with sparks???[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]...guess what i'm leaning toward[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]