Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Sport vs a Utility

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 1, 2005 | 09:00 PM
  #31  
DesertViper's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,446
Likes: 0
Default Sport vs a Utility

At ~$250 the front Elka springs were worth the money, but the $650 Works Ultracross rear shock was not worth the money at all. The problem with solid rear axle utility quad rear suspension is the shaft drive, and the fact that under power the ring gear trys to climb up the pinion gear. So when you give it the gas it stands up on its rear suspension, and when you let off the gas it settles back down again. That effect really takes away from the responsiveness of the suspension over big acceleration bumps (whoops), and makes it tough to tune in the suspension so that it works good both under acceleration, and off throttle. Every wonder why street sportbikes still have chain drive, and cruiser bikes have shaft drive? Its because shaft drive rear suspensions start getting real funky as power output increases. And the stock Prairie 700 has this problem badly enough as it is, so when you double HP output with a big bore motor the problem just gets worse.

Your Grizzly has independent suspension at both ends though, which would I think tend to eliminate this problem, even though it still has shaft drive. I would suspect that high dollar suspension on your Grizzly would help alot more than high dollar suspension did on my Prairie.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Johnny Mac
Trailers, Toy Haulers, Motorhomes.
60
Dec 14, 2019 06:13 PM
ATVC Correspondent
Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires
2
Sep 30, 2015 01:37 AM
Hack714
General Chat
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:11 AM
cboler9
Yamaha
3
Sep 24, 2015 08:35 PM
Hack714
Buying an ATV
11
Sep 20, 2015 05:54 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.