yz250 vs eclipse
#51
#52
yz250 vs eclipse
Originally posted by: recon99
I think the yz might take an eclipse if it's an automatic tranny 4 banger, but that's about it. An eclipse with a 5 speed or a v6 is a hell of a lot faster and should take the bike easy.
I think the yz might take an eclipse if it's an automatic tranny 4 banger, but that's about it. An eclipse with a 5 speed or a v6 is a hell of a lot faster and should take the bike easy.
This guy is a idiot... My dad runs a 8 second old's and its a manual automatice ( gears with no clutch)....
#53
yz250 vs eclipse
I say this with experience eclipse all of them are slow unless modded deep I had a freind that got into the tuner crap and got a 94 eclipse turbo got his azz handed to him about every race so he went to a eagle talon awd turbo nos it was pretty fast but kept breakeing down lol cv axles blowing apart then he got a 04 GT eclipse put a after market turbo on it my stock motor would pull 2-3 car lengths then when we hit hit 5th then i pulled away no chance and im here to tell you the STOCK GT MUSTANG isnt about much to me it isnt that fast 1-2-3rd is ok 4th seems to be weak and top of 5th is fasssssssssssssssst but anyways my point being ECLIPSE CARS ARE CRAP!!!
#54
yz250 vs eclipse
Isnt this an atv fourm? lol jk I will bet my 2009 Ford esperagh will smoke any thing u guys have! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] lol jk No but seriously its a 2010 model with 1985 ford f-150 rear springs pushin 125hp at the front left tire. It has millitary grade seats in it for those long hauls when u have eatin sumtin u shouldnt have. LOL jk
#55
yz250 vs eclipse
Originally posted by: ScottyG44
This guy is a idiot... My dad runs a 8 second old's and its a manual automatice ( gears with no clutch)....
Originally posted by: recon99
I think the yz might take an eclipse if it's an automatic tranny 4 banger, but that's about it. An eclipse with a 5 speed or a v6 is a hell of a lot faster and should take the bike easy.
I think the yz might take an eclipse if it's an automatic tranny 4 banger, but that's about it. An eclipse with a 5 speed or a v6 is a hell of a lot faster and should take the bike easy.
This guy is a idiot... My dad runs a 8 second old's and its a manual automatice ( gears with no clutch)....
#56
#57
yz250 vs eclipse
it's not just how fast you can shift. the torque converter in an automatic kills about 20 horsepower, and a manual doesn't lose anything through the clutch. I'm not saying that automatics suck, i'm saying in a car with low power output the manual is faster. I know that the automatic has quite a few advantages for a car built up for drag racing, being faster to shift, faster off the line, less possibility of human error with shifting and clutch, and better control of wheelspin. But we're not talking about a built up car, just a stock one. With the dinky little motor in a stock eclipse 20 horsepower is too much of a loss to gain back by shifting fast.
#58
yz250 vs eclipse
An automatic doesnt let you rev all the way to the redline until your on the last automatic gear. A manual transmission allows you to control your shift points (can take it all the way to the redline, dont hold it, the engine would blow, meaning u have to replace it), alowing you to sustain that extra horespower that is contained in an automatic. And about the eclispe, if it was a gs-t, it would kill the yz.
#59
#60
yz250 vs eclipse
I think your trying to ask me why cant you hold it at the redline. The answer is because the engine works to hard when the revs go up, the engine works harder and moves faster, but the gear your on doesnt let u go faster, thats you shift up, and if your on your last gear, DOWNSHIFT!!