Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Which quad is best for me???????

Old Mar 6, 2001 | 08:10 AM
  #11  
scramdaddy400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Default

Hey QuadChick

For the same price as a 300ex or warrior you can buy the scrambler 400 2x4. This machine will do the trails, mud, etc with ease. The fact it has a 400cc two stroke engine wedged in it helps too (largest production 2 stroke engine still made in a quad).
It has REVERSE!!! (and the power to beat a 400ex in a drag...forwards and backwards. )

2000 SCRAMBLER 400 2X4

SCRAMDADDY400
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 11:08 AM
  #12  
AirBanshee01's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

Dont worry if you get a Blaster ill be sure and help you turn it around!!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 11:12 AM
  #13  
redrocker's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Default

My chick rides a 400ex and loves it
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 11:34 AM
  #14  
Tooey's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
Default

hey Ridind Maniac 420,
A warrior is not to heavy.where I ride there is alot of chicks riding warriors. All of your way less that 200 pounds.LovleyQuadDhick i would get a 400ex.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 11:55 AM
  #15  
Screamin96's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Default

Sounds like a Blaster would be perfect for you. But it doesnt have reverse, but is lightweight. A warrior has reverse, but is heavy. A 250x/300ex would be a good choice too. Hey check out https://atvconnection.com/ the best site on the net for ATV information.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 11:58 AM
  #16  
WoodzKodiak's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Default

Id say Scrambler 500 2x4 or warrior
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 02:15 PM
  #17  
660R01's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Default

If you want no shifting you could go with that Polaris like Scramdaddy said. You wont beat any 400EX's in a drag unless there is close to zero traction, he's blowing smoke up u're ***. As much as we dont like the magazines opinions, every one of them has done sport shootouts and the Scramblers are always slower than the EX by a pretty decent amount.
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 09:41 PM
  #18  
scramdaddy400's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Default

400cc 2 stroke Vs. 400cc 4 stroke.

hummm...don't know who's going to win that one.

LONG LIVE POLARIS!!!

2000 SCRAMBLER 400 2X4

SCRAMDADDY400
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 09:46 PM
  #19  
DevRay's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Default

I had a blaster when i was young, it is the perfect machine for a smaller person who likes to go fast!
 
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2001 | 10:38 PM
  #20  
No2StrokeBs's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 692
Likes: 0
Default

Gee, I dont know which one would win either, but id put my money on the one that does NOT weigh as much as you average TANK! Most females would rather not wrestle any variety of Polaris.

You can put a 500 hp 454 in a Go-Cart and it will be fast, but put the same engine in a Battleship, and it wont even make a wake, point is that the Polaris 400 engine may be stronger, but it dont matter because Polaris has never heard of anything lighter than cast iron
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 AM.