Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

12:1 .020 over 660 raptor. what is the new displacement?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2002 | 04:01 PM
  #1  
jay660Raptor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

I just had my raptor punched out .020 over w/ a 12:1 compression piston. I know .020 over doesn't make much off a difference, but i dont know how to do the actual math to see the final displacement. If anyone knows the equation or can tell me, it is appreciated.
jay[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2002 | 06:01 PM
  #2  
ZRWHAT's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Default

Its just the volume of the cylinder with the stock stroke of 84mm that you are calculating. Here is the equation.

Total Disp.=Area of Piston * Length of Stroke

Total Disp.=(pi*radius^2) * 84mm

Total Disp.=(3.14159*50mm^2) * 84mm

Total Disp.=659.7cm^3 is stock(Convert from mm^3 to cm^3 for CC's move decimel 3 places left)

Convert your 0.020in into mm = 0.508mm So your new diameter is 100.508mm instead of 100mm which is stock. Don't forget to devide by 2 to use in the equation, its the Radius not the diameter.

Hope this helps!
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2002 | 06:05 PM
  #3  
ZRWHAT's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Default

I guess you've got a 666, sounds F'ing scary to me!
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2002 | 06:33 PM
  #4  
jmc's Avatar
jmc
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

Here is the simple formula: Bore x Bore x.7854 x Stroke =CC's
 
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2002 | 07:41 PM
  #5  
raptor720's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Default

Jay,

What "devil" told you to only go with the .020 666cc?? It is the same $$ to do the 102 and the performance increase is major.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2002 | 12:12 PM
  #6  
CBUS660R's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 386
Likes: 1
Default

jmc, your "simple formula" doesn't work. All you have done is work backwards to find a false conversion factor that has no application outside of a cylinder with a 100mm bore. If you change the bore, your .7854 conversion factor no longer works. You have to use the formula provided by ZRWHAT to actually figure out displacement for any engine.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2002 | 10:02 PM
  #7  
scottd's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Default

I just did it on three different conversions, and it sure works for me.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2002 | 10:46 PM
  #8  
2000MOJAVE's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Default

JMC's formula works every way I tried it.
 
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2002 | 11:06 PM
  #9  
sduncan's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

Try the following: bore x bore x stroke x 3.1416 = displacement. This always worked for me, but then again, math was always my worst subject!!!
 
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2002 | 03:39 AM
  #10  
jmc's Avatar
jmc
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Default

CBUS66R
I think you had better think again.But then what would A.Graham Bell know anyway.100x100x.7854x84=659.736cc.Another eg.100.5x100.5x.7854x84=666.349cc.Do any bore and stroke you like.A retraction would be nice.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:46 AM.