THUNDERCAT
Mar 4, 2004 | 12:48 PM
#21
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
THUNDERCAT
I have a 2002 MC 600 efi, what do you mean by fast, top speed about 85-90 miles/hr, my friend has a 99 piped rmk 600 and I beat him every time, they climb very good, for a 600, you would be surprised where they will go, about 110 hp. But a mountain machine is not made for drag racing either.
Mar 5, 2004 | 05:19 PM
#23
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
THUNDERCAT
Originally posted by: doober
Machzmissle, I guess I should have been more precise in how I said that, i ment it will beat the Tcat, not necessarily in a drag race I am talking about climbing, and as for being the dumbest thing you have heard in a while, take a look at what you said, how can you say that the 1000 doo will kill the 900 when the doo was just released and there is probably not even one out on the snow yet?? I am not trying to start any kind of brand bashing here but think before you speak.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
Machzmissle, I guess I should have been more precise in how I said that, i ment it will beat the Tcat, not necessarily in a drag race I am talking about climbing, and as for being the dumbest thing you have heard in a while, take a look at what you said, how can you say that the 1000 doo will kill the 900 when the doo was just released and there is probably not even one out on the snow yet?? I am not trying to start any kind of brand bashing here but think before you speak.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
Who cares about testing. Yea the kingkaty 900 will beat the T-cat up a hill you are right about. Not being on the snow yet does not make a difference. The Kingkitty is geared for the hill which there will be no top end. Personally I am not brand bias cause if the manufatures weren't good they wouldn't be in business, but the MACH Z 1000 is a lake racer man, the kink kitty would get spanked! I think it would be a good race out of the whole, cause the KK's 162 is gonna have alot more traction, and the MACH would prolly spin out but Once traction is maid SEEE YA!
Mar 5, 2004 | 05:21 PM
#24
Trailblazer
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Mar 6, 2004 | 02:30 AM
#27
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 1
From: Bismarck North Dakota
THUNDERCAT
Machz... I caught a few westerners and some cunnucks there already [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img]
----- Gimp -----
----- Gimp -----
Mar 6, 2004 | 08:19 AM
#28
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
THUNDERCAT
The F7 will not go 134. It will not go 125. It will not go 120. Fastest I've seen is 113 and we all know that speedos (especially Cat's) are about 10 percent optimistic. The F5 would be LUCKY to see 100. The new Mach Z is running 127 on radar. That is the fastest production sled to date.
Mar 6, 2004 | 12:59 PM
#29
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
THUNDERCAT
Originally posted by: sledheadrich
The F7 will not go 134. It will not go 125. It will not go 120. Fastest I've seen is 113 and we all know that speedos (especially Cat's) are about 10 percent optimistic. The F5 would be LUCKY to see 100. The new Mach Z is running 127 on radar. That is the fastest production sled to date.
The F7 will not go 134. It will not go 125. It will not go 120. Fastest I've seen is 113 and we all know that speedos (especially Cat's) are about 10 percent optimistic. The F5 would be LUCKY to see 100. The new Mach Z is running 127 on radar. That is the fastest production sled to date.