Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
#1
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
I'll admit that my blaster is a small quad. It's an 05 Blaster that have no engine mods. A guy I work with just bought the new Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad. He thinks he actually stands a chance in a race on the power lines. Did I miss something? Is there something I should know about these quads??? Did a 735 lb four stroke, four wheel drive, driveway plowing utility quad suddendly become fast??? The blaster may only be a 200 CC quad but it's made for racing, weighs 400 lbs less than the Arctic, handles better and is a two stoke. What do you guys think?
Thanks
Thanks
#2
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
I would put money on my V2 beating your blaster at top end anyday. You might win on take off, but i wouldnt count on top end being in your favor, and i dont even know if you would win on take off. I have a V-Twin, which is known for its low and mid range torque. Im not sure about the H1, catterman has one and could probably help you on that one.
#5
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
if you want a fair race take him out on the gravel road and race him flat out. i actually think that would be a pretty close race but they are made for 2 entirely different things the v2 is made for working and can pull a ton even though it is still fun to ride. the blaster is fun to play in the pits with and couldn't pull a radio flyer wagon. i rode the blaster a few years ago and admit it is a fun lil machine and suprisingly has good power for a 200 but i dunno would be interesting.
#6
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
He chose the power lines. I know full well that I would lose on a long flat road. I would never even argue that. Here's the thing: This guys is bashing my blaster because its a 200. He says he will smoke it anywhere. I intend to show him that the blaster is will out perform a utility quad when its on the terrain that it is designed for.
#7
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
I agree here, onin a gravel pit, with 90 degree turns, and whoops, and numerous turns, you will have the advantage. Its a sport quad, thats what it does best, against a utility which is made for power , fourwheel drive, and trails. You will win on a race course, but not on a straight run
Trending Topics
#8
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
i think it depends on how aggressive the riders are. my two friends and i rode on some power lines and one of them has a z 400 the other kawasaki 750 and then i have an arctic cat 500 manual. i didnt stand a chance, 27' tires and a big heavy bike with steep hills. the brute force 750, 27' tires and plenty of power ,but being a heavy bike and trying to steer correctly(bad bump steer) he didnt do to bad. he could have been more aggressive. he didnt win though either. the z 400,plenty of power,light,and aggresive rider wins.
#9
Arctic Cat 650 Utility quad vs Yamaha Blaster HAHAHAHA
Originally posted by: v2rider
I would put money on my V2 beating your blaster at top end anyday. You might win on take off, but i wouldnt count on top end being in your favor, and i dont even know if you would win on take off. I have a V-Twin, which is known for its low and mid range torque. Im not sure about the H1, catterman has one and could probably help you on that one.
I would put money on my V2 beating your blaster at top end anyday. You might win on take off, but i wouldnt count on top end being in your favor, and i dont even know if you would win on take off. I have a V-Twin, which is known for its low and mid range torque. Im not sure about the H1, catterman has one and could probably help you on that one.