Which big bore utility?
#14
I also would buy the KQ before any of the other chioces. I rode my KQ for a year and I'd still own it if BRP did'nt come out with such a great 2-seater Max 800. Except for the 0-9 mph lag,the KQ will leave a smile on your face that you wont forget for a long time.
The Polaris ATVs are very heavy and this extra weight can hamper you on a long trailride if its a slow and technicle trail. Other than that, the Polaris is a good choice too. Just too many things I dont like about the BF. I also like the 660 Grizz but would never select it over the KQ.
The Polaris ATVs are very heavy and this extra weight can hamper you on a long trailride if its a slow and technicle trail. Other than that, the Polaris is a good choice too. Just too many things I dont like about the BF. I also like the 660 Grizz but would never select it over the KQ.
#15
Why not AC? They have the best utility quads as far as the Speed Rack accessories, which can quickley attatch anything, and thats not exaggerating. And they have a two inch reciever for trailering, best ground clearance, and only true front and rear IRS. But if not, then i would go with the KQ as my next choice.
#18
KQ is more nimble in tighter spaces,steers easier and has a range of about 90-100 miles of trail riding. The Grizz is larger and has a little better ride to it. It also has a range of about 90-100 miles on a tank of gas,depending on speeds and type of terrain.
#19
Basically the KQ is a grizz with 35cc more and efi. Only other diff are the grizz has more ground clearance and suspension travel. They are priced about about the same. I have driven them both and they ride and drive very similar. The grizz has a little more lowend grunt, but mid and top goes to the KQ. I would buy the KQ between the two.
#20
carburetors are time tested, what improvements does EFI bring? Are there any drawbacks? Have thy been around (on quads ) long enough to be deemed reliable? Thanks for all the good advice.


